Trial reportCirculation2000
Secondary prevention by raising HDL cholesterol and reducing triglycerides in patients with coronary artery disease.
Trial report in Circulation, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
284 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Inflammatory Activities in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Co-morbid Angiopathies and Exploring Beneficial Interventions: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in public health · 2020Pooled it
- Association Between Triglyceride Lowering and Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk Across Multiple Lipid-Lowering Therapeutic Classes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Circulation · 2019 · on this mapPooled it
- Effects of high-density lipoprotein targeting treatments on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2019 · on this mapPooled it
- 2017 Position Paper of the Italian Society for Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC) for an Updated Clinical Management of Hypercholesterolemia and Cardiovascular Risk: Executive Document.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017Guideline
- Fibrates for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease events.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016 · on this mapPooled it
- Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Fibrates for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Baseline diabetes as a way to predict CV outcomes in a lipid-modifying trial: a meta-analysis of 330,376 patients from 47 landmark studies.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2015Pooled it
- Guideline
- Association of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene polymorphism, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis using a Mendelian randomization approach.BMC medical genetics · 2014Pooled it
- Effect on cardiovascular risk of high density lipoprotein targeted drug treatments niacin, fibrates, and CETP inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials including 117,411 patients.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Pooled it
- Effect of HDL-raising drugs on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-regression.PloS one · 2014 · on this mapPooled it
- Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: a meta-analysis of fibrates for stroke prevention.BMC neurology · 2013Pooled it
- Circulating biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular disease risk; a systematic review and comprehensive overview of meta-analyses.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Evaluation and treatment of hypertriglyceridemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2012Guideline
- Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Use of fibrates and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 long-term randomized placebo-controlled trials.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Secondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac events.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of pemafibrate versus bezafibrate on hepatic and vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2023Trial
224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, high triglyceride levels, or both are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but the clinical impact of raising HDL-C or decreasing triglycerides remains to be confirmed. METHODS AND
resultsIn a double-blind trial, 3090 patients with a previous myocardial infarction or stable angina, total cholesterol of 180 to 250 mg/dL, HDL-C < or =45 mg/dL, triglycerides < or =300 mg/dL, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < or =180 mg/dL were randomized to receive either 400 mg of bezafibrate per day or a placebo; they were followed for a mean of 6.2 years. The primary end point was fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction or sudden death. Bezafibrate increased HDL-C by 18% and reduced triglycerides by 21%. The frequency of the primary end point was 13. 6% on bezafibrate versus 15.0% on placebo (P=0.26). After 6.2 years, the reduction in the cumulative probability of the primary end point was 7.3%, (P=0.24). In a post hoc analysis in the subgroup with high baseline triglycerides (> or =200 mg/dL), the reduction in the cumulative probability of the primary end point by bezafibrate was 39.5% (P=0.02). Total and noncardiac mortality rates were similar, and adverse events and cancer were equally distributed.
conclusionsBezafibrate was safe and effective in elevating HDL-C levels and lowering triglycerides. An overall trend in a reduction of the incidence of primary end points was observed. The reduction in the primary end point in patients with high baseline triglycerides (> or =200 mg/dL) requires further confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10880410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.