Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10875836›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

The limits to demand for health care.

S Frankel, S Ebrahim, G Davey Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early-switch versus late-switch in patients with diabetic macular edema: a cost-effectiveness study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fair rationing is essentially local: an argument for postcode prescribing.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Does advanced access work for patients and practices?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Beta interferon, NICE, and rationing.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  13. Are GP leaders scared of sex?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  14. An oral history of general practice 4: changing practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  15. RCGP 'virtual genetics' group meeting: 'the use of the family history in primary care'.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  16. The end of the affair--public health medicine 1974-2002.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  17. Defining and cultivating the virtues.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  18. The medicalisation of old age.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S FrankelDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR. stephen.frankel@bris.ac.uk
S Ebrahim
G Davey Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandDelivery of Health CareHealth Care CostsHealth Care RationingHumansPublic OpinionState MedicineUnited KingdomHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID10875836
PMCPMC1127687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.