ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2000
Questions about the behaviour of bacterial pathogens in vivo.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of MRSA virulence gene expression by the wall teichoic acid enzyme TarO.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Mathematical modeling of the 'inoculum effect': six applicable models and the MIC advancement point concept.FEMS microbiology letters · 2020Article
- Structural and functional insights into the periplasmic detector domain of the GacS histidine kinase controlling biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Quantitative Tracking ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2017Article
- Identification of Enterococcus faecalis antigens specifically expressed in vivo.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2015Article
- Preferential use of central metabolism in vivo reveals a nutritional basis for polymicrobial infection.PLoS pathogens · 2015Article
- Article
- The emergence of Vibrio pathogens in Europe: ecology, evolution, and pathogenesis (Paris, 11-12th March 2015).Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Structural and functional characterization of the Clostridium perfringens N-acetylmannosamine-6-phosphate 2-epimerase essential for the sialic acid salvage pathway.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- The effects of vaccination and immunity on bacterial infection dynamics in vivo.PLoS pathogens · 2014Article
- Alternative strategies for proof-of-principle studies of antibacterial agents.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Review
- Catabolism of host-derived compounds during extracellular bacterial infections.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2014Article
- Monitoring of Vibrio harveyi quorum sensing activity in real time during infection of brine shrimp larvae.The ISME journal · 2012Article
- Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends on lipoamide dehydrogenase, a member of three multienzyme complexes.Cell host & microbe · 2011Article
- Development and analysis of an in vivo-compatible metabolic network of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.BMC systems biology · 2010Article
- Carbon metabolism of intracellular bacterial pathogens and possible links to virulence.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2010Review
- In Vitro Synergy of Levofloxacin Plus Piperacillin/Tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2009Article
- Modelling within-host spatiotemporal dynamics of invasive bacterial disease.PLoS biology · 2008Article
- Sucrose metabolism contributes to in vivo fitness of Streptococcus pneumoniae.Molecular microbiology · 2007Article
- Effect of host lactate on gonococci and meningococci: new concepts on the role of metabolites in pathogenicity.Infection and immunity · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial pathogens cause disease in man and animals. They have unique biological properties, which enable them to colonize mucous surfaces, penetrate them, grow in the environment of the host, inhibit or avoid host defences and damage the host. The bacterial products responsible for these five biological requirements are the determinants of pathogenicity (virulence determinants). Current knowledge comes from studies in vitro, but now interest is increasing in how bacteria behave and produce virulence determinants within the infected host. There are three aspects to elucidate: bacterial activities, the host factors that affect them and the metabolic interactions between the two. The first is relatively easy to accomplish and, recently, new methods for doing this have been devised. The second is not easy because of the complexity of the environment in vivo and its ever-changing face. Nevertheless, some information can be gained from the literature and by new methodology. The third aspect is very difficult to study effectively unless some events in vivo can be simulated in vitro. The objectives of the Discussion Meeting were to describe the new methods and to show how they, and conventional studies, are revealing the activities of bacterial pathogens in vivo. This paper sets the scene by raising some questions and suggesting, with examples, how they might be answered. Bacterial growth in vivo is the primary requirement for pathogenicity. Without growth, determinants of the other four requirements are not formed. Results from the new methods are underlining this point. The important questions are as follows. What is the pattern of a developing infection and the growth rates and population sizes of the bacteria at different stages? What nutrients are present in vivo and how do they change as infection progresses and relate to growth rates and population sizes? How are these nutrients metabolized and by what bacterial mechanisms? Which bacterial processes handle nutrient deficiencies and antagonistic conditions that may arise? Conventional and new methods can answer the first question and part of the second; examples are described. The difficulties of trying to answer the last two are discussed. Turning to production in vivo of determinants of mucosal colonization, penetration, interference with host defence and damage to the host, here are the crucial questions. Are putative determinants, which have been recognized by studies in vitro, produced in vivo and are they relevant to virulence? Can hitherto unknown virulence determinants be recognized by examining bacteria grown in vivo? Does the complement of virulence determinants change as infection proceeds? Are regulatory processes recognized in vitro, such as ToxR/ToxS, PhoP/PhoQ, quorum sensing and type III secretion, operative in vivo? What environmental factors affect virulence determinant production in vivo and by what metabolic processes? Examples indicate that the answers to the first four questions are 'yes' in most but not all cases. Attempts to answer the last, and most difficult, question are also described. Finally, sialylation of the lipopolysaccharide of gonococci in vivo by host-derived cytidine 5'-mono-phospho-N-acetyl neuraminic acid, and the effect of host lactate are described. This investigation revealed a new bacterial component important in pathogenicity, the host factors responsible for its production and the metabolism involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.