Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10872502›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2000

Mutation detection in the breast cancer gene BRCA1 using the protein truncation test.

W Moore, I Bogdarina, U A Patel, M Perry, C Crane-Robinson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W MooreBiophysics Laboratories, University of Portsmouth, UK.
I Bogdarina
U A Patel
M Perry
C Crane-Robinson
University of Portsmouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 400 distinct mutations have been defined in the BRCA1 gene, and these are spread fairly evenly through the 5592 bp of coding DNA. This circumstance presents a formidable challenge for mutation screening. Apart from total direct sequencing, the preferred screening method has been single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) gels, with a smaller input from constant denaturant gradient electrophoresis (CDGE), heteroduplex (HD) analysis, and mismatch cleavage. The protein truncation test (PTT) was used early in BRCA1 mutation screening but has not been widely adopted, perhaps because a straightforward analysis of the whole BRCA1 gene requires working with RNA and all its perceived problems. The present work was undertaken to assess the practicality of using the PTT under routine conditions for the screening of long genes such as BRCA1 that are not highly expressed in lymphocytes. We conclude that, provided RNA preparation is carried out effectively and consistently, the PTT approach has significant advantages over other methodologies such as SSCP gels.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1MutationBase SequenceCohort StudiesDNA PrimersExonsHumansPolymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalProtein BiosynthesisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID10872502
OpenAlexW2094687136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.