Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10871755›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2000

An improved anion-exchange HPLC method for the detection and purification of adenoviral particles.

F Blanche, B Cameron, A Barbot, L Ferrero, T Guillemin, S Guyot, S Somarriba, D Bisch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Chromatographic Purification of Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Purification of Bionanoparticles.Chemical engineering & technology · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F BlancheProcess Development, Gene Therapy, Centre de Recherche de Vitry/Alfortville, Vitry/Seine Cedex, France.
B Cameron
A Barbot
L Ferrero
T Guillemin
S Guyot
S Somarriba
D Bisch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed an anion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method using Q Sepharose XL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as adsorbent to analyze samples containing adenovirus. This method has several major advantages over the HPLC method previously described for quantitating particles, namely (1) a >10-fold improvement in the detection limit of adenovirus in crude preparations; (2) absence of interferences originating from nucleic acids and proteins which usually contaminate crude samples; (3) unprecedented sharpness and symmetry of adenovirus peak, rendering the identification of the viral peak unambiguous, even in extremely crude and dilute preparations; and (4) no enzymatic treatment required even for crude samples. This assay was used to quantitate particles in samples taken at the transfection and amplification stages of production of various recombinant adenovirus, and in cultures of wild-type adenovirus of different serotypes. A modification of this analytical method was also developed for the purification of infectious adenovirus particles, including fiber-modified and third-generation recombinant viruses, giving highly purified preparations from low-titer crude lysates with an excellent overall recovery (50-74%).

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAdenoviridaeCell LineChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansSerotypingTransfection

Identifiers

PMID10871755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.