Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10868866›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2000

Effects of nicotinamide and intravenous insulin therapy in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.

J Vidal, M Fernández-Balsells, G Sesmilo, E Aguilera, R Casamitjana, R Gomis, I Conget

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Involvement of SIRT1 in ZnJournal of diabetes & metabolism · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J VidalEndocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdicas August Pi i Sunyer, Hospital Clínic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.
M Fernández-Balsells
G Sesmilo
E Aguilera
R Casamitjana
R Gomis
I Conget
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of intravenous insulin therapy combined with nicotinamide in the metabolic control and beta-cell function of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in comparison with intensive insulin therapy and nicotinamide alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA total of 34 newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients were included. After the correction of initial metabolic disturbances, subjects were randomly assigned to the following three groups within 72 h after admission: 1) intensive insulin therapy + placebo (C) (n = 12); 2) intensive insulin therapy + nicotinamide, 700 mg three times a day (NIC) (n = 11); and 3) 72-h intravenous insulin followed by intensive insulin therapy + nicotinamide, 700 mg three times a day (NIV) (n = 11). The subjects were monitored for 12 months. GAD, tyrosine phosphatase antibodies, and insulin autoantibodies were measured. C-peptide was measured basally and after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min of 1 mg intravenous glucagon. HbA1c, glucagon, and antibody measurements were determined initially and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

resultsHbA1c values declined to normal after treatment was initiated in all groups and remained not significantly different during the follow-up period. We did not find differences between experimental (NIC and NIV) and placebo (C) groups in terms of beta-cell function, considering basal or glucagon-stimulated C-peptide (maximal stimulated C-peptide and area under the curve [AUC] of C-peptide) values during the follow-up period. After pooling data from the NIC and NIV groups (both including nicotinamide) and comparing it with data from the C group, the results remained unchanged. At diagnosis, GAD positivity was observed in 10 of 12, 8 of 11, and 10 of 11 subjects (NS) in the C, NIC, and NIV groups, respectively, and IA2 positivity was observed in 3 of 12, 4 of 11, and 4 of 11 subjects (NS) in the C, NIC, and NIV groups, respectively. Antibody titers displayed a similar behavior in all groups during the follow-up period.

conclusionsOur pilot study failed to demonstrate that the addition of 72-h intravenous insulin and nicotinamide to conventional intensive insulin therapy produces any beneficial effect in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in terms of beta-cell function and metabolic control.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsAdultAutoantibodiesC-PeptideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansInjections, IntravenousInsulinIslets of LangerhansMaleNiacinamidePilot ProjectsProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 1Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesAutoantibodiesC-PeptideGlutamate DecarboxylaseICA512 autoantibodyInsulinNiacinamideProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 1Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID10868866
OpenAlexW2120176477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.