Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10866679›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000

Polarized growth controls cell shape and bipolar bud site selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Y J Sheu, Y Barral, M Snyder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chitin Biosynthesis inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell-cycle control of cell polarity in yeast.The Journal of cell biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y J SheuDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8103, USA.
Y Barral
M Snyder
Yale University · US

Funding

TWO SIGNALING PATHWAYS INVOLVED IN YEAST MORPHOGENESISR01GM036494 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2007
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM36494NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the relationship between polarized growth and division site selection, two fundamental processes important for proper development of eukaryotes. Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells exhibit an ellipsoidal shape and a specific division pattern (a bipolar budding pattern). We found that the polarity genes SPA2, PEA2, BUD6, and BNI1 participate in a crucial step of bud morphogenesis, apical growth. Deleting these genes results in round cells and diminishes bud elongation in mutants that exhibit pronounced apical growth. Examination of distribution of the polarized secretion marker Sec4 demonstrates that spa2Delta, pea2Delta, bud6Delta, and bni1Delta mutants fail to concentrate Sec4 at the bud tip during apical growth and at the division site during repolarization just prior to cytokinesis. Moreover, cell surface expansion is not confined to the distal tip of the bud in these mutants. In addition, we found that the p21-activated kinase homologue Ste20 is also important for both apical growth and bipolar bud site selection. We further examined how the duration of polarized growth affects bipolar bud site selection by using mutations in cell cycle regulators that control the timing of growth phases. The grr1Delta mutation enhances apical growth by stabilizing G(1) cyclins and increases the distal-pole budding in diploids. Prolonging polarized growth phases by disrupting the G(2)/M cyclin gene CLB2 enhances the accuracy of bud site selection in wild-type, spa2Delta, and ste20Delta cells, whereas shortening the polarized growth phases by deleting SWE1 decreases the fidelity of bipolar budding. This study reports the identification of components required for apical growth and demonstrates the critical role of polarized growth in bipolar bud site selection. We propose that apical growth and repolarization at the site of cytokinesis are crucial for establishing spatial cues used by diploid yeast cells to position division planes.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell CycleCell DivisionCell PolarityCell WallCyclin BCytoskeletal ProteinsFungal ProteinsGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, FungalIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMicrofilament ProteinsMutationProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesrab GTP-Binding ProteinsBni1 protein, S cerevisiaeBUD6 protein, S cerevisiaeCLB2 protein, S cerevisiaeCyclin BCytoskeletal ProteinsFungal ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMicrofilament ProteinsPEA2 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesrab GTP-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSEC4 protein, S cerevisiaeSPA2 protein, S cerevisiaeSTE20 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID10866679
PMCPMC85972
OpenAlexW2120682650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.