Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10864225›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

Preclinical perspectives on platinum resistance.

L R Kelland

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular mechanism of CD163Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

L R KellandCRC Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, England.
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 30 years since the introduction of cisplatin into the clinic, laboratory studies have provided considerable information as to both how the drug exerts its antitumour effects and how some tumours are, or become, resistant. Once inside a cell, the chlorine groups of cisplatin are exchanged for water (aqua) species, which are more chemically reactive. The intracellular target for cisplatin is DNA, where a variety of adducts are formed, some on the same strand of DNA (intrastrand adducts) and others between strands (interstrand adducts). Of the 4 bases, guanine is the preferred site for binding and the most common adduct involves linkages on 2 adjacent guanines on the same strand of DNA. It remains uncertain which of the various types of adduct is the most important in terms of producing antitumour effects. Resistance to cisplatin has been studied extensively using tumour cells repeatedly exposed to the drug in vitro. In these cell models, resistance is generally due to a combination of mechanisms, some resulting in reduced damage to DNA and others following DNA damage. Resistance due to inadequate binding to DNA has been shown to be caused by reduced drug uptake (influx rather than efflux) and inactivation by thiol-containing species such as glutathione and metallothioneins. Resistance occurring post-DNA binding may be due to changes in DNA repair pathways [an increase in nucleotide excision repair (NER) or a loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR)]. Conversely, the hypersensitivity of some cell lines to cisplatin has been shown to be due to defective NER, through loss or reduced expression of NER proteins such as XPG and XPA. Resistance may also be mediated through alterations in proteins involved in programmed cell death (apoptosis) such as p53 and the BCL2 family. A basic understanding of cisplatin resistance pathways has made a major impact in the development of new platinum analogues capable of circumventing resistance. Examples (which are now undergoing clinical trial) include ZD0473 (which, relative to cisplatin, possesses a reduced reactivity towards inactivating thiol-containing molecules) and the trinuclear platinum BBR3464 (which has markedly different DNA binding properties compared with cisplatin).

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCisplatinDNA AdductsDNA RepairDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatincisplatin-DNA adductDNA Adducts

Identifiers

PMID10864225
OpenAlexW2071811082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.