Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10861329›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2000

Randomized trials or observational tribulations?

S J Pocock, D R Elbourne

Abstract readCommentEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Clozapine for psychotic disorders in adults with intellectual disabilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. The effectiveness and safety of proton radiation therapy for indications of the eye : a systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2009
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Azathioprine. Safety profile in multiple sclerosis patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2007
    Pooled it
  15. Guideline
  16. Pooled it
  17. Artificial and bioartificial support systems for liver failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S J Pocock
D R Elbourne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTherapeuticsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.