Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10857991›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2000

Proteasome inhibition: a new strategy in cancer treatment.

J Adams, V J Palombella, P J Elliott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Nrf2/PGC1Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Suppression of 19S proteasome subunits marks emergence of an altered cell state in diverse cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J AdamsProScript, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
V J Palombella
P J Elliott
Allscripts (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is a highly conserved intracellular pathway for the degradation of proteins. Many of the short-lived regulatory proteins which govern cell division, growth, activation, signaling and transcription are substrates that are temporally degraded by the proteasome. In recent years, new and selective inhibitors of the proteasome have been employed in cell culture systems to examine the anti-tumor potential of these agents. This review covers the chemistry of selected proteasome inhibitors, possible mechanisms of action in cell culture and the in vivo examination of proteasome inhibitors in murine and human xenograft tumor models in mice. One inhibitor, PS-341, has recently entered Phase I clinical trials in cancer patients with advanced disease to further test the potential of this approach.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCysteine EndopeptidasesHumansMiceMultienzyme ComplexesNeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexAntineoplastic AgentsCysteine EndopeptidasesMultienzyme ComplexesProteasome Endopeptidase Complex

Identifiers

PMID10857991
OpenAlexW51250104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.