ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2000
Workshop to identify critical windows of exposure for children's health: cardiovascular and endocrine work group summary.
Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of longitudinal pet ownership with wheezing in 3-year-old children using the distributed lag model: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2024Article
- Review
- Semiparametric distributed lag quantile regression for modeling time-dependent exposure mixtures.Biometrics · 2023Article
- The impact of correlated exposures and missing data on multiple informant models used to identify critical exposure windows.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Early prenatal exposure to air pollutants and congenital heart disease: a nested case-control study.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Nutritional Programming: History, Hypotheses, and the Role of Prenatal Factors in the Prevention of Metabolic Diseases-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Low and High Ambient Temperatures during Pregnancy and Birth Weight among 624,940 Singleton Term Births in Israel (2010-2014): An Investigation of Potential Windows of Susceptibility.Environmental health perspectives · 2021Article
- Associations of Trimester-Specific Exposure to Bisphenols with Size at Birth: A Chinese Prenatal Cohort Study.Environmental health perspectives · 2019Article
- Statistical Approaches for Investigating Periods of Susceptibility in Children's Environmental Health Research.Current environmental health reports · 2019Review
- Potential for Bias When Estimating Critical Windows for Air Pollution in Children's Health.American journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- Bayesian distributed lag interaction models to identify perinatal windows of vulnerability in children's health.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- A Review of the Field on Children's Exposure to Environmental Contaminants: A Risk Assessment Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Review
- Identifying important life stages for monitoring and assessing risks from exposures to environmental contaminants: results of a World Health Organization review.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2014Review
- Article
- Statistical methods to study timing of vulnerability with sparsely sampled data on environmental toxicants.Environmental health perspectives · 2011Article
- A framework for assessing risks to children from exposure to environmental agents.Environmental health perspectives · 2004Review
- Identifying critical windows of exposure for children's health.Environmental health perspectives · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The work group on cardiovascular and endocrine effects was asked to review the current state of knowledge about children's windows of vulnerability to developmental toxicants and to recommend how that information may be used to improve risk assessment and public health. We considered differences between structural defects, where periods of vulnerability are rather well defined, and functional defects, where periods of vulnerability are quite elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.