ReviewImmunologic research2000
Genetic studies in systemic autoimmunity and aging.
Review in Immunologic research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case of very late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and updated pooled analysis of late-onset cases in the literature.Rheumatology international · 2012Review
- T-helper cell intrinsic defects in lupus that break peripheral tolerance to nuclear autoantigens.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2005Review
- Representational difference analysis in a lupus-prone mouse strain results in the identification of an unstable region of the genome on chromosome 11.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The etiopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus remains an enigma that will probably not be solved until the genetic basis for susceptibility is defined. Through genomewide searches, we have provided a foundation for this by identifying and characterizing loci predisposing to specific disease traits in four major lupus-susceptible mouse strains. Further ongoing work that includes the study of interval-specific congenic lines and precise mapping of loci should lead to identification of the corresponding genes and elucidation of processes critical for disease pathogenesis. Another important area of investigation is the study of cell-cycle and apoptosis genes in systemic autoimmunity and aging. Based on earlier work, we proposed that the characteristic overexpansion of memory phenotype cells in these conditions may be owing to replicative senescence. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate the generation of these cells may permit selective manipulations to control this process. Other areas of investigation that we are actively engaged in are the role of T cell receptor repertoire in disease and the definition of cellular genes affected by infection with human immunodeficiency virus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10852108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.