Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10851056›Full record

ReviewOncogene2000

The biology of Stat4 and Stat6.

A L Wurster, T Tanaka, M J Grusby

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Regulation of mCell biology and toxicology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. VariantThe New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immune cell subset differentiation and tissue inflammation.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2018
    Review

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A L WursterDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, MA 02115, USA.
T Tanaka
M J Grusby

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IL-4 and IL-12 are cytokines that are important regulators of the proliferation, differentiation and functional capacity of lymphocytes. STATs (signal transducers and activators of transcription) are transcription factors that provide a direct link between the cytokine receptors and cytokine induced gene transcription. Stat6 and Stat4 are two STAT family members that specifically mediate signals that emanate from the IL-4 and IL-12 receptors, respectively. Recently a great deal of progress has been made in understanding the specific roles that Stat6 and Stat4 play in lymphocyte function through in vitro as well as in vivo studies using Stat6 and Stat4-deficient mice. This report will summarize and describe the recent advances made in understanding the activation and regulation of Stat6 and Stat4 as well as their roles in the development of an immune response. Oncogene (2000).

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell DivisionDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHumansInterleukin-12MiceMice, KnockoutReceptors, Interleukin-4Signal TransductionSTAT4 Transcription FactorSTAT6 Transcription FactorT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerTrans-ActivatorsDNA-Binding ProteinsInterleukin-12Receptors, Interleukin-4STAT4 protein, humanStat4 protein, mouseSTAT4 Transcription FactorSTAT6 protein, humanStat6 protein, mouseSTAT6 Transcription FactorTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID10851056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.