Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10847516›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal1999

Osteoporosis: the increasing role of the orthopaedist.

M B Dobbs, J Buckwalter, C Saltzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determination of the Combined Effects of Asian Herbal Medicine with Calcium and/or Vitamin D Supplements on Bone Mineral Density in Primary Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Longitudinal associations between changes in bone mechanical strength and fracture risk estimated by μFRAC.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Choose your mother wisely: the familial resemblance of bone adaptation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Japanese quails (Frontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M B DobbsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Buckwalter
C Saltzman
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is an ever-increasing problem as our population ages. However, it is also to a large extent a preventable problem. The orthopaedist now has the ability to determine bone mass, the rate of turnover, and the fracture risk. Skeletal bone mass can be evaluated with DXA; the rate of bone resorption can be determined by assessment of collagen-degradation urinary products; and the weight status, fracture history, and history of smoking can be used to predict the fracture risk in individual patients. The orthopaedic physician also needs to take an active role in advising their younger patients about achieving peak bone mass. All individuals should follow a program that includes adequate calcium replacement, 400 to 800 units of vitamin D, appropriate exercise, avoidance of significant weight loss, and cessation of smoking. At menopause, women should evaluate their risk factors and consider the use of estrogen not only for its skeletal benefits but also for its nonosseous effects. In patients with contraindications or an aversion to hormone therapy, bone densitometry should be performed to determine risks before expensive nonhormonal treatment is initiated. Additional studies such as measurement of collagen degradation products will help establish whether the patient's resorptive rate is high or stable. If the bone mass is 2.5 SDs below normal peak or if there is an increase in resorption, use of either estrogen, bisphosphontes, or calcitonin may be appropriate. If there is evidence of low-turnover osteoporosis with decreased osteoblast formation, sodium fluoride should be considered. Two thirds of the cost of osteoporosis in the United States is due to hip fractures. The orthopaedist is the primary physician who comes in contact with these fracture patients. It is therefore his or her responsibility to become knowledgeable about the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. The bisphosphonates, hormones, and calcitonin provide predictable restoration of bone mass and significantly decrease the rate of osteoporotic fractures.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultCalcitoninCalcium, DietaryDensitometryExerciseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOrthopedicsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPhysician's RoleRisk FactorsCalcitoninCalcium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID10847516
PMCPMC1888612
OpenAlexW1459075092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.