Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10845409›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

Pharmacological properties of parenteral cephalosporins: rationale for ambulatory use.

E Strehl, F Kees

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Global Proteomic Analysis ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E StrehlClinical Pharmacy, Hospital of the Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg/Br., Freiburg, Germany.
F Kees

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenteral cephalosporins are among the most frequently used antibiotics in hospital therapy. They are characterised by an extended spectrum of activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, and some also have good activity against anaerobes. They kill proliferating bacterial cells rapidly, and generally show only a low tendency to select resistant mutants. However, there are cephalosporin compounds which induce cephalosporinases very rapidly in certain microorganisms. Together with other beta-lactam antibiotics, parenteral cephalosporins interfere with bacterial cell wall synthesis by inhibiting peptidoglycan cross-linkage. Because of this specific target, they are nontoxic to mammalian cells, and have a very favourable adverse effect profile. The chemical stability of parenteral cephalosporins in aqueous solution is good. After intravenous injection, high concentrations of these agents are achieved in serum and tissue. Most cephalosporins are eliminated unchanged via the kidney, with a half-life of 1 to 2 hours. But there are also derivatives with a serum half-life of more than 2 and up to 8 hours, allowing 12- or 24-hour dosage intervals. Because of their reliable efficacy and low risk of adverse effects, the parenteral cephalosporins offer a high degree of tolerability even in the setting of outpatient antibiotic therapy. In particular, the derivatives of the third generation are characterised by unique pharmacological properties.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareBacterial InfectionsCephalosporinsHumansInfusions, ParenteralCephalosporins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.