Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10836498›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2000

Searching for kinesin's mechanical amplifier.

R D Vale, R Case, E Sablin, C Hart, R Fletterick

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A comparative study of motor-protein motions by using a simple elastic-network model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R D ValeHoward Hughes Medical Institute, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA. vale@phy.ucsf.edu
R Case
E Sablin
C Hart
R Fletterick
University of California, San Francisco · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF MOLECULAR MOTORSP01AR042895 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COOKE, ROGER A · 1994 to 2008
$9.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR042895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinesin, a microtubule-based motor, and myosin, an actin-based motor, share a similar core structure, indicating that they arose from a common ancestor. However, kinesin lacks the long lever-arm domain that is believed to drive the myosin power stroke. Here, we present evidence that a much smaller region of ca. 10-40 amino acids serves as a mechanical element for kinesin motor proteins. These 'neck regions' are class conserved and have distinct structures in plus-end and minus-end-directed kinesin motors. Mutagenesis studies also indicate that the neck regions are involved in coupling ATP hydrolysis and energy into directional motion along the microtubule. We suggest that the kinesin necks drive motion by undergoing a conformational change in which they detach and re-dock onto the catalytic core during the ATPase cycle. Thus, kinesin and myosin have evolved unique mechanical elements that amplify small, nucleotide-dependent conformational changes that occur in their similar catalytic cores.

Indexed as

AnimalsKinesinsModels, MolecularMolecular Motor ProteinsMovementMuscle ContractionMyosinsProtein ConformationKinesinsMolecular Motor ProteinsMyosins

Identifiers

PMID10836498
PMCPMC1692751
OpenAlexW1963716975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.