Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10827045›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Hospital admissions for acute anaphylaxis: time trend study.

A Sheikh, B Alves

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Documented in Electronic Health Records.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and longitudinal trends of food allergy during childhood and adolescence: Results of the Isle of Wight Birth Cohort study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Consumer preferences for food allergen labeling.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Oral food desensitization.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2010
    Review
  19. Peanut allergy: an overview.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

A SheikhDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, London W2 1PG. aziz.sheikh@ic.ac.uk
B Alves
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisEnglandHospitalizationHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID10827045
PMCPMC27386
OpenAlexW1990313948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.