Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10817513›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2000

Relevance of proliferative and pro-apoptotic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer for patient survival.

M Volm, R Koomägi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Entinostat/Syndax 275 in Osteosarcoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  3. Prognostic markers in lung cancer: is it ready for prime time?Translational lung cancer research · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M VolmDepartment of Oncological Diagnostics and Therapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.
R Koomägi
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This investigation first set out to analyse which cellular proliferative and apoptotic factors, in addition to the clinical prognostic factors, are most predictive in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). To this purpose, we related the proliferative factors proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cyclin A, cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2), cdk4 and the proportion of cell cycle phases in NSCLC to the survival times of 150 patients. Additionally, we associated the expressions of Fas, Fas ligand and caspase-3 in NSCLC to patient survival. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the proteins and flow cytometry to assess the proportion of cell cycle phases. Patients with PCNA-positive carcinomas had significantly shorter survival times than patients with PCNA-negative carcinomas (median survival times: 51 vs 89 weeks). Corresponding results were obtained with the factor cyclin A (64 vs 92 weeks), with the factor cdk2 (76 vs 89 weeks), with the factor cdk4 (62 vs 102 weeks) and with the proportion of S phases (86 vs 121 weeks). Patients with an expression of the apoptotic factors had a more favourable prognosis than patients with negative carcinomas. The median survival times of cancer patients with Fas expression was 86 weeks and of those without Fas expression only 69 weeks. Corresponding results were obtained with the Fas ligand (87 vs 41 weeks) and caspase 3 (87 vs 34 weeks). In order to determine whether a combination of factors can yield improved prognostic information, we investigated all possible combinations of the proliferative and apoptotic factors. Patients with tumours having a high proliferative activity, but which did not express apoptotic factors had the shortest survival times while patients with a low proliferative activity and a high expression of apoptotic factors had the most favourable outcome. A multivariate analysis (Cox model) of the cellular and clinical prognostic factors indicated that stage, lymph node involvement, Fas, PCNA and cyclin A are the most important prognostic factors for the clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung carcinomas.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceApoptosisCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleCell Cycle ProteinsFASLG protein, humanFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorMembrane GlycoproteinsNeoplasm ProteinsProliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Identifiers

PMID10817513
PMCPMC2374507
OpenAlexW1490292616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.