Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10813631›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2000

Force-velocity and unloaded shortening velocity during graded potassium contractures in frog skeletal muscle fibres.

F Colomo, L Pizza, A Scialpi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F ColomoDipartimento di Scienze Fisiologiche, Unirersità degli Studi di Firenze, Italy. pizza@server1.pharm.unifi.it
L Pizza
A Scialpi

Funding

Telethon 197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steady-state conditions of contraction, at maximal and submaximal forces, were produced in intact single muscle fibres, from Rana esculenta, using full tetani and graded K+-contractures. The uniformity in radial direction. of spreading of activation produced in K+-contractures, was checked in relation to the fibre diameters. The absolute isometric force was similar in tetani and maximal contractures, for fibres with diameters between 40 and 60 microm, but not for fibres with diameters greater than about 70 microm in which contracture force never reached tetanic force. The force [K+]o relation was similar for fibres with diameters between 40 and 60 microm. but it was right shifted and it had a minor slope for fibres with diameters greater than 65-70 microm. This suggests that only in the small diameter fibres (40-60 microm) the activation does not fail to penetrate uniformly from the surface towards the fibre core. For fibres selected in the diameter range between 40 and 60 microm, force-velocity relations and unloaded shortening velocities were determined in tetani and maximal and submaximal contractures. Data were obtained across a force range of 0.3 to 1 P0 (tetanic plateau force). Controlled velocity method was used to obtain force-velocity relations, and slack test to determine the unloaded shortening velocity (VU). The values of the parameters characterising the force velocity relation (V0 and a/P0) and VU as determined by the slack test did not differ significantly in tetani and contractures, independent of the activation level or absolute force developed by the fibre. These results show that. at least within the range of forces tested. crossbridge kinetics is independent of the number of cycling crossbridges, in agreement with the prediction of the 'recruitment' model of myofilament activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SizeMuscle ContractionMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalPotassiumRana esculentaRheologyPotassium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.