Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10811911›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

High frequency of hypermethylation at the 14-3-3 sigma locus leads to gene silencing in breast cancer.

A T Ferguson, E Evron, C B Umbricht, T K Pandita, T A Chan, H Hermeking, J R Marks, A R Lambers, P A Futreal, M R Stampfer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 444 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The mechanobiome: a goldmine for cancer therapeutics.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. 14-3-3σ and Its Modulators in Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A T FergusonJohns Hopkins Oncology Center, 410 BBCRB, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000, USA.
E Evron
C B Umbricht
T K Pandita
T A Chan
H Hermeking
J R Marks
A R Lambers
P A Futreal
M R Stampfer
S Sukumar
Columbia University · USDuke Medical Center · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

HUMAN MAMMARY CELLSR01CA024844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI STAMPFER, MARTHA R · 1985 to 2002
$1.6M
CHROMATIN-TELOMERE STRUCTURE AND AT GENOMIC SENSITIVITYR01NS034746 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PANDITA, TEJ K · 1996 to 2005
$1.2M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN ONCOLOGY IMAGINGT32CA009630 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BHUJWALLA, ZAVER M · 1989 to 2001
$239k
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE AND CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESISR01CA048943 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SUKUMAR, SARASWATI · 1989 to 2000
$238k
MAMMARY CELLSR37CA024844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI STAMPFER, MARTHA R · 1989 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-24844NCI NIH HHS CA48943NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009630NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09630NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of 14-3-3 final sigma (final sigma) is induced in response to DNA damage, and causes cells to arrest in G(2). By SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression) analysis, we identified final sigma as a gene whose expression is 7-fold lower in breast carcinoma cells than in normal breast epithelium. We verified this finding by Northern blot analysis. Remarkably, final sigma mRNA was undetectable in 45 of 48 primary breast carcinomas. Genetic alterations at final sigma such as loss of heterozygosity were rare (1/20 informative cases), and no mutations were detected (0/34). On the other hand, hypermethylation of CpG islands in the final sigma gene was detected in 91% (75/82) of breast tumors and was associated with lack of gene expression. Hypermethylation of final sigma is functionally important, because treatment of final sigma-non-expressing breast cancer cell lines with the drug 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine resulted in demethylation of the gene and synthesis of final sigma mRNA. Breast cancer cells lacking final sigma expression showed increased number of chromosomal breaks and gaps when exposed to gamma-irradiation. Therefore, it is possible that loss of final sigma expression contributes to malignant transformation by impairing the G(2) cell cycle checkpoint function, thus allowing an accumulation of genetic defects. Hypermethylation and loss of final sigma expression are the most consistent molecular alterations in breast cancer identified so far.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene SilencingTyrosine 3-Monooxygenase14-3-3 ProteinsAzacitidineBreastBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineCell Line, TransformedCell Transformation, NeoplasticCpG IslandsDecitabineDNA RepairEpithelial Cells14-3-3 ProteinsAzacitidineCell Cycle ProteinsDecitabineNeoplasm ProteinsProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, NeoplasmTyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

Identifiers

PMID10811911
PMCPMC18556
OpenAlexW2140787953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.