Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10811863›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2000

Comparative analysis of genetically modified dendritic cells and tumor cells as therapeutic cancer vaccines.

C Klein, H Bueler, R C Mulligan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dendritic cell activation and maturation induced by recombinant calreticulin fragment 39-272.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C KleinHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
H Bueler
R C Mulligan
Harvard University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have directly compared the efficacy of two immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer: "vaccination" of tumor-bearing mice with genetically modified dendritic cells (DCs), and vaccination with genetically modified tumor cells. Using several different preexisting tumor models that make use of B16F10 melanoma cells expressing a target tumor antigen (human melanoma-associated gene [MAGE]-1), we found that vaccination with bone marrow-derived DCs engineered to express MAGE-1 via adenoviral-mediated gene transfer led to a dramatic decrease in the number of metastases in a lung metastasis model, and led to prolonged survival and some long-term cures in a subcutaneous preexisting tumor model. In contrast, vaccination with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-transduced tumor cells, previously shown to induce potent antitumor immunity in standard tumor challenge assays, led to a decreased therapeutic effect in the metastasis model and no effect in the subcutaneous tumor model. Further engineering of DCs to express either GM-CSF, tumor necrosis factor alpha, or CD40 ligand via retroviral-mediated gene transfer, led to a significantly increased therapeutic effect in the subcutaneous tumor model. The immunological mechanism, as shown for GM-CSF-transduced DCs, involves MAGE-1-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Expression of GM-CSF by DCs led to enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity, potentially mediated by increased numbers of DCs in draining lymph nodes. Our results suggest that clinical studies involving the vaccination with genetically modified DCs may be warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD4 AntigensCD8 AntigensDendritic CellsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGenetic EngineeringGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImmunotherapyMelanoma, ExperimentalMelanoma-Specific AntigensMiceMice, CongenicAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD4 AntigensCD8 AntigensGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMAGEA1 protein, humanMageb1 protein, mouseMelanoma-Specific AntigensNeoplasm ProteinsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID10811863
PMCPMC2193145
OpenAlexW2116286338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.