Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10810093›Full record

ArticleGenome research2000

Identification of novel human genes evolutionarily conserved in Caenorhabditis elegans by comparative proteomics.

C H Lai, C Y Chou, L Y Ch'ang, C S Liu, W Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 220 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
220citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

220 citing papers in PubMed, 470 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. UtilizingPreventive nutrition and food science · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dietary mycotoxin toxicity inAdvances in neurotoxicology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Harnessing coumarin-thio(seleno)cyanate conjugates: potentJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  17. HarnessingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

160 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C H LaiInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan, Republic of China.
C Y Chou
L Y Ch'ang
C S Liu
W Lin
Chung Yuan Christian University · TWInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern biomedical research greatly benefits from large-scale genome-sequencing projects ranging from studies of viruses, bacteria, and yeast to multicellular organisms, like Caenorhabditis elegans. Comparative genomic studies offer a vast array of prospects for identification and functional annotation of human ortholog genes. We presented a novel comparative proteomic approach for assembling human gene contigs and assisting gene discovery. The C. elegans proteome was used as an alignment template to assist in novel human gene identification from human EST nucleotide databases. Among the available 18,452 C. elegans protein sequences, our results indicate that at least 83% (15,344 sequences) of C. elegans proteome has human homologous genes, with 7,954 records of C. elegans proteins matching known human gene transcripts. Only 11% or less of C. elegans proteome contains nematode-specific genes. We found that the remaining 7,390 sequences might lead to discoveries of novel human genes, and over 150 putative full-length human gene transcripts were assembled upon further database analyses. [The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, HelminthAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDatabases, FactualExpressed Sequence TagsHumansMolecular Sequence DataOrgan SpecificityProteomeProteome

Identifiers

PMID10810093
PMCPMC310876
OpenAlexW1967695632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.