Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10807890›Full record

Trial reportGut2000

Faecal calprotectin levels in a high risk population for colorectal neoplasia.

O Kronborg, M Ugstad, P Fuglerud, B Johne, J Hardcastle, J H Scholefield, K Vellacott, V Moshakis, J R Reynolds

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin for screening patients with colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Factors Associated With Loss of Fecal Biomarker Accuracy During Routine Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fecal calprotectin concentrations in cancer patients with Clostridium difficile infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O KronborgOdense University Hospital, Denmark.
M Ugstad
P Fuglerud
B Johne
J Hardcastle
J H Scholefield
K Vellacott
V Moshakis
J R Reynolds
Odense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaecal concentrations of the protein calprotectin have been found to be elevated in patients with colorectal neoplasia, suggesting that it might be used as a screening tool for colorectal cancer as well as adenomas.

aimsTo measure the sensitivity and specificity of faecal calprotectin for the detection of adenomas in high risk individuals undergoing colonoscopy. Also, to investigate between and within stool variability of calprotectin concentrations. SUBJECTS: A total of 814 patients planned for colonoscopy were included for the following indications: positive faecal occult blood test, 25; neoplasia surveillance, 605; newly detected polyp, 130; and family risk, 54.

methodsTwo faecal samples from each of two stools were analysed using the PhiCal ELISA test device (Nycomed Pharma AS).

resultsAdenoma patients had significantly higher calprotectin levels than normal subjects (median 9.1 (95% confidence interval 7.5-10.1) v 6.6 (5.6-7.4)mg/l). There was no significant decrease in calprotectin levels after polypectomy. Levels in cancer patients were significantly higher than those in all other subgroups (median 17.6 mg/l (11.5-31.0)). With a cut off limit of 10 mg/l, the sensitivity for cancer was 74% and for adenoma 43%. Corresponding specificity values were 64% for no cancer and 67% for no neoplasia (cancer+adenoma). Specificity varied from 71% for one stool sample to 63% for four samples. Stool variability was small, suggesting that two spots from one stool were as discriminative as two spots from each of two stools.

conclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of faecal calprotectin levels as a marker for colorectal adenoma and carcinoma justifies its use in high risk groups, but specificity is too low for screening of average risk persons. Lack of a decrease in levels after polypectomy may be due to a more widespread leucocyte migration into the intestinal lumen than that at the polyp site, and needs further investigation.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFecesHumansLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMembrane GlycoproteinsNeural Cell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID10807890
PMCPMC1756457
OpenAlexW2120911825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.