ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2000
Time-resolved spectral observations of cadmium-enriched cadmium sulfide nanoparticles and the effects of DNA oligomer binding.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal Sulfide Nanoparticles: Precursor Chemistry.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021Review
- Beauty is skin deep: a surface monolayer perspective on nanoparticle interactions with cells and bio-macromolecules.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2011Review
- Optical imaging-guided cancer therapy with fluorescent nanoparticles.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2010Review
- Semiconductor quantum dots as fluorescent probes for in vitro and in vivo bio-molecular and cellular imaging.Nano reviews · 2010Article
- Are quantum dots ready for in vivo imaging in human subjects?Nanoscale research letters · 2007Article
- Emission Spectral Properties of Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles with Multiphoton Excitation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2002Article
- Molecular immunolabeling with recombinant single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibodies designed with metal-binding domains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We measured the steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spectral properties of cadmium-enriched nanoparticles (CdS-Cd2+). These particles displayed two emission maxima, at 460 and 580 nm. The emission spectra were independent of excitation wavelength. Surprisingly, the intensity decays were strongly dependent on the observation wavelength, with longer decay times being observed at longer wavelengths. The mean lifetime increased from 150 to 370 ns as the emission wavelength was increased from 460 to 650 nm. The wavelength-dependent lifetimes were used to construct the time-resolved emission spectra, which showed a growth of the long-wavelength emission at longer times, and decay-associated spectra, which showed the longer wavelength emission associated with the longer decay time. These nanoparticles displayed anisotropy values as high as 0.35, depending on the excitation and emission wavelengths. Such high anisotropies are unexpected for presumably spherical nanoparticles. The anisotropy decayed with two correlation times near 5 and 370 ns, with the larger value probably due to overall rotational diffusion of the nanoparticles. Addition of a 32-base pair oligomer selectively quenched the 460-nm emission, with less quenching being observed at longer wavelengths. The time-resolved intensity decays were minimally affected by the DNA, suggesting a static quenching mechanism. The wavelength-selected quenching shown by the nanoparticles may make them useful for DNA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.