Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10804288›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of cancer research : Gann2000

Screening of BRCA1 mutation using immunohistochemical staining with C-terminal and N-terminal antibodies in familial ovarian cancers.

K Kashima, T Oite, Y Aoki, K Takakuwa, H Aida, H Nagata, M Sekine, H J Wu, Y Hirai, Y Wada and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2008
    Article
  9. Familial breast/ovarian cancer and BRCA1/2 genetic screening: the role of immunohistochemistry as an additional method in the selection of patients.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

K KashimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
T Oite
Y Aoki
K Takakuwa
H Aida
H Nagata
M Sekine
H J Wu
Y Hirai
Y Wada
K Yamamoto
K Hasegawa
T Sonoda
T Maruo
I Nagata
M Ohno
M Suzuki
I Kobayashi
K Kuzuya
T Takahashi
Y Torii
K Tanaka
Niigata University · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPJichi Medical University · JPKagawa University · JPKindai University · JPKobe University · JPNational Cancer Center · USNational Defense Medical College · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPRed Cross Hospital · GRSeirei Hamamatsu General Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the subcellular localization of BRCA1 proteins using immunohistochemical staining with C-terminal (GLK-2 antibody) and N-terminal (Ab-2 antibody) monoclonal antibodies in 44 familial ovarian cancers. Among these, 24 cases were associated with 13 independent germ-line mutations of BRCA1, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at one or more BRCA1 microsatellite markers was found in all 21 informative tumors tested. With GLK-2 antibody, cytoplasmic staining was observed in 15 of 16 tumors (93.8%) with mutation in exon 11, and BRCA1 staining was absent in 8 of 8 tumors (100%) with mutation in exons other than exon 11. When immunohistochemical staining was performed with Ab-2 antibody, both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining were observed in 14 of 16 tumors (87.5%) with mutation in exon 11. Interestingly, nuclear staining was observed in 3 of 3 tumors (100%) with mutation downstream of exon 11, even though no staining was detected in 5 of 5 tumors (100%) with mutation upstream of exon 11. On the other hand, in familial ovarian cancers without BRCA1 mutations, nuclear staining or both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was observed in 18 of 20 specimens (90%) and 20 of 20 specimens (100%) with GLK-2 antibody and with Ab-2 antibody, respectively. These results suggest that an immunohistochemical assay in combination with employing the C-terminal and the N-terminal antibodies appears to have potential as a reliable and useful technique for the screening of BRCA1 mutations, at least to predict the status of mutation, upstream or downstream of exon 11.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Germ-Line MutationBRCA1 ProteinFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLoss of HeterozygosityOvarian NeoplasmsOvaryBRCA1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID10804288
PMCPMC5926460
OpenAlexW1968096086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.