Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10804036›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

Concurrent gonococcal and chlamydial infection: how best to treat.

A J Robinson, G L Ridgway

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A J RobinsonDepartment of Genitourinary Medicine, Mortimer Market Centre, London, England.
G L Ridgway
Mortimer Market Centre · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians treating concurrent gonococcal and chlamydial infections have a variety of drugs to choose from. Neisseria gonorrhoeae is adept at developing resistance and the choice of antibiotic must be dictated to some extent by the patterns of resistance in the locality of the clinician. In contrast, resistance of Chlamydia trachomatis to some classes of drugs has been shown in vitro but does not appear to be clinically important at present. The success of treatment depends on patient compliance with the drug administration schedule. With these organisms, which can be carried asymptomatically, many patients are unlikely to comply with courses of antibiotics. Although single-dose therapy with azithromycin is available and established for chlamydial genital infection, it is more expensive and difficult to justify in a cash limited Healthcare system, and its efficacy for treating concurrent gonococcal infection requires further study. In patients where compliance is likely to be of concern, its use may be justified. Another major deterrent for completing antibiotic courses is the adverse effect profile. Most of the available drugs cause only minor adverse effects, in particular gastrointestinal. Ofloxacin has a better profile than doxycycline but is considerably more expensive. Newer fluoroquinolones, found to be effective in vitro, are being assessed in clinical studies. However, more evidence is required before recommending these over the tried and tested therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChlamydia InfectionsFemaleGonorrheaHumansPregnancyAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID10804036
OpenAlexW2073123709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.