Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10799436›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2000

Nijmegen breakage syndrome. The International Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Study Group.

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Update on Recommendations for Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Children with Genomic Instability Disorders.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  5. Infections in DNA Repair Defects.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Interstitial Lung Disease in Immunocompromised Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human RAD50 deficiency: Confirmation of a distinctive phenotype.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Chromosome instability syndromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2019
    Review
  18. Hereditary myeloid malignancies.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder. NBS-1, the gene defective in NBS, is located on chromosome 8q21 and has recently been cloned. The gene product, nibrin, is a novel protein, which is member of the hMre11/hRad50 protein complex, suggesting that the gene is involved in DNA double strand break repair.

aimsTo study the clinical and laboratory features of NBS as well as the genotype-phenotype relation.

methodsFifty five patients with NBS, included in the NBS registry in Nijmegen were evaluated. The majority of the patients were of eastern European ancestry. Most of them had shown a truncating 5 bp deletion 657-661 delACAAA. Four further truncating mutations have been identified in patients with other distinct haplotypes. RESULTS AND

conclusionsEssential features found in NBS were microcephaly, usually without severe retardation, typical facial appearance, immunodeficiency, chromosomal instability, x ray hypersensitivity, and predisposition to malignancy. In 40% of the patients cancer was noted before the age of 21 years. Important additional features were skin abnormalities, particularly café au lait spots and vitiligo, and congenital malformations, particularly clinodactyly and syndactyly. Congenital malformations, immunodeficiency, radiation hypersensitivity, and cancer predisposition were comprehensible in case of dysfunctioning of DNA repair mechanisms. No specific genotype-phenotype relation could be found. Patients with the same genotype may show different phenotypes and patients with different genotypes may express the same phenotype. Specific mutations did not lead to specific clinical features.

Indexed as

AdultChromosome BreakageChromosomes, Human, Pair 8Common Variable ImmunodeficiencyCongenital AbnormalitiesConsanguinityFaciesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMicrocephalyMutationNeoplasmsPhenotypeRadiation ToleranceRegistries

Identifiers

PMID10799436
PMCPMC1718318
OpenAlexW2710485086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.