Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10797608›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2000

Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR).

R S Riley, D Rowe, L M Fisher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03647254 (Effectivity of a Joint Didactic Intervention by School for Patients on Inappropriate Control Prothrombin Time Anticoagulated Patients. Protocol for Developing a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03647254 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectivity of a Joint Didactic Intervention by School for Patients on Inappropriate Control Prothrombin Time Anticoagulated Patients. Protocol for Developing a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrancisco Javier Navarro MoyaRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1ConditionsHealth Education, Patient Education as Topic, Blood Coagulation TestsArmsPatient education group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Considerations of Coagulopathy in Acute Liver Failure.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2020
    Review
  8. Global Trigger Tool: Proficient Adverse Drug Reaction Autodetection Method in Critical Care Patient Units.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R S RileyDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0250, USA. rsriley@hsc.vcu.edu
D Rowe
L M Fisher
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prothrombin time (PT) is one of the most important laboratory tests to determine the functionality of the blood coagulation system. It is used in patient care to diagnose diseases of coagulation, assess the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing operative procedures, monitor patients being treated with oral anticoagulant (coumadin) therapy, and evaluate liver function. The PT is performed by measuring the clotting time of platelet-poor plasma after the addition of calcium and thromboplastin, a combination of tissue factor and phospholipid. Intra- and interlaboratory variation in the PT was a significant problem for clinical laboratories in the past, when crude extracts of rabbit brain or human placenta were the only source of thromboplastin. The international normalized ratio (INR), developed by the World Health Organization in the early 1980s, is designed to eliminate problems in oral anticoagulant therapy caused by variability in the sensitivity of different commercial sources and different lots of thromboplastin to blood coagulation factor VII. The INR is used worldwide by most laboratories performing oral anticoagulation monitoring, and is routinely incorporated into dosage planning for patients receiving warfarin. Although the recent availability of sensitive PT reagents prepared from recombinant human tissue factor (rHTF) and synthetic phospholipids eliminated many of the earlier problems associated with the use of crude thromboplastin preparations, local instrument variability in the INR still remains a problem. Presently, the use of plasma calibrants seems the best solution to this problem. Standardizing the point-of-care instruments for INR monitoring is another dilemma faced by the industry. Ultimately, new generations of anticoagulant drugs may eliminate the need for laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.

Indexed as

Prothrombin TimeHematologyHumansInternational Normalized Ratio

Identifiers

PMID10797608
PMCPMC6807747
OpenAlexW1996084709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.