ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2000
Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR).
Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03647254 (Effectivity of a Joint Didactic Intervention by School for Patients on Inappropriate Control Prothrombin Time Anticoagulated Patients. Protocol for Developing a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectivity of a Joint Didactic Intervention by School for Patients on Inappropriate Control Prothrombin Time Anticoagulated Patients. Protocol for Developing a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical Biosensors for Blood Coagulation Monitoring: Advantages, Limitations, and Translational Potential.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Coagulation Dysfunction in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Splenomegaly and Its Countermeasures: A Retrospective Study of 1522 Patients.Disease markers · 2023Article
- Notes from the Field: Coagulopathy Associated with Brodifacoum Poisoning - Florida, December 2021.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2022Article
- Control-Relevant Adaptive Personalized Modeling From Limited Clinical Data for Precise Warfarin Management.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Updates in Anticoagulation Therapy Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Article
- Clinical Considerations of Coagulopathy in Acute Liver Failure.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2020Review
- Global Trigger Tool: Proficient Adverse Drug Reaction Autodetection Method in Critical Care Patient Units.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Article
- A Pharmacogenetically Guided Acenocoumarol Dosing Algorithm for Chilean Patients: A Discovery Cohort Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Assessment of patients' warfarin knowledge and anticoagulation control at a joint physician- and pharmacist-managed clinic in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Ischemic Stroke: Risk Stratification, Warfarin Teatment and Outcome Measure.Journal of atrial fibrillation · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prothrombin time (PT) is one of the most important laboratory tests to determine the functionality of the blood coagulation system. It is used in patient care to diagnose diseases of coagulation, assess the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing operative procedures, monitor patients being treated with oral anticoagulant (coumadin) therapy, and evaluate liver function. The PT is performed by measuring the clotting time of platelet-poor plasma after the addition of calcium and thromboplastin, a combination of tissue factor and phospholipid. Intra- and interlaboratory variation in the PT was a significant problem for clinical laboratories in the past, when crude extracts of rabbit brain or human placenta were the only source of thromboplastin. The international normalized ratio (INR), developed by the World Health Organization in the early 1980s, is designed to eliminate problems in oral anticoagulant therapy caused by variability in the sensitivity of different commercial sources and different lots of thromboplastin to blood coagulation factor VII. The INR is used worldwide by most laboratories performing oral anticoagulation monitoring, and is routinely incorporated into dosage planning for patients receiving warfarin. Although the recent availability of sensitive PT reagents prepared from recombinant human tissue factor (rHTF) and synthetic phospholipids eliminated many of the earlier problems associated with the use of crude thromboplastin preparations, local instrument variability in the INR still remains a problem. Presently, the use of plasma calibrants seems the best solution to this problem. Standardizing the point-of-care instruments for INR monitoring is another dilemma faced by the industry. Ultimately, new generations of anticoagulant drugs may eliminate the need for laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10797608PMC6807747W1996084709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.