SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?International journal of colorectal disease · 2008Trial
- Randomised controlled trial of conservative management of postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: six year follow up.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Trial
- Conservative management of persistent postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Trial
- Office-based management of fecal incontinence.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Article
- Anorectal physiology: test and clinical application.Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology · 2010Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic floor disorders: what's new and what to do.Gastroenterology · 2010Review
- Pelvic floor muscle lesions at endoanal MR imaging in female patients with faecal incontinence.European radiology · 2008Article
- Relation of bowel habits to fecal incontinence in women.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2008Article
- New options for the treatment of fecal incontinence.Ochsner journal · 2008Article
- Fecal incontinence.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2007Article
- Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence.International journal of colorectal disease · 2006Article
- Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.Postgraduate medical journal · 2006Review
- [Fecal incontinence].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2004Article
- [What is evidence based in the therapy of pelvic floor insufficiency?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2004Article
- Biofeedback versus electrostimulation in treatment of anal sphincter insufficiency.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2003Article
- Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2003Article
- Fecal Incontinence.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2001Article
- Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy.Revista latino-americana de enfermagemArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaecal incontinence is a particularly embarrassing and distressing condition with significant medical, social and economic implications. Sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy have been used to treat the symptoms of people with faecal incontinence. However, standards of treatment are still lacking and the magnitude of alleged benefits has yet to be established.
objectivesTo determine the effects of biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises/pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and all reference lists of relevant articles up to November 1999. Date of the most recent searches: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises in adults with faecal incontinence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and two reviewers independently extracted data from included trials. A wide range of outcome measures were considered. MAIN
resultsOnly five eligible studies were identified with a total of 109 participants. In the majority of trials methodological quality was poor or uncertain. All trials were small and employed a limited range of outcome measures. Follow-up information was not consistently reported amongst trials. Only two trials provided data in a form suitable for statistical analyses. There are suggestions that rectal volume discrimination training improves continence more than sham training and that anal biofeedback combined with exercises and electrical stimulation provides more short-term benefits than vaginal biofeedback and exercises for women with obstetric-related faecal incontinence. Further conclusions are not warranted from the available data. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe limited number of identified trials together with their methodological weaknesses do not allow a reliable assessment of the possible role of sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy in the management of people with faecal incontinence. There is a suggestions that some elements of biofeedback therapy and sphincter exercises may have a therapeutic effect, but this is not certain. Larger well-designed trials are needed to enable safe conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.