Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796859›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults.

C Norton, G Hosker, M Brazzelli

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Office-based management of fecal incontinence.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Article
  5. Anorectal physiology: test and clinical application.Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology · 2010
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Relation of bowel habits to fecal incontinence in women.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Fecal incontinence.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2007
    Article
  11. Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence.International journal of colorectal disease · 2006
    Article
  12. Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.Postgraduate medical journal · 2006
    Review
  13. [Fecal incontinence].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2004
    Article
  14. [What is evidence based in the therapy of pelvic floor insufficiency?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2004
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2003
    Article
  17. Fecal Incontinence.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2001
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C NortonPhysiology Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford Road, Harrow, UK, HA1 3UJ. csnorton@aol.com
G Hosker
M Brazzelli
St Mark's Hospital · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaecal incontinence is a particularly embarrassing and distressing condition with significant medical, social and economic implications. Sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy have been used to treat the symptoms of people with faecal incontinence. However, standards of treatment are still lacking and the magnitude of alleged benefits has yet to be established.

objectivesTo determine the effects of biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises/pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and all reference lists of relevant articles up to November 1999. Date of the most recent searches: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises in adults with faecal incontinence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and two reviewers independently extracted data from included trials. A wide range of outcome measures were considered. MAIN

resultsOnly five eligible studies were identified with a total of 109 participants. In the majority of trials methodological quality was poor or uncertain. All trials were small and employed a limited range of outcome measures. Follow-up information was not consistently reported amongst trials. Only two trials provided data in a form suitable for statistical analyses. There are suggestions that rectal volume discrimination training improves continence more than sham training and that anal biofeedback combined with exercises and electrical stimulation provides more short-term benefits than vaginal biofeedback and exercises for women with obstetric-related faecal incontinence. Further conclusions are not warranted from the available data. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe limited number of identified trials together with their methodological weaknesses do not allow a reliable assessment of the possible role of sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy in the management of people with faecal incontinence. There is a suggestions that some elements of biofeedback therapy and sphincter exercises may have a therapeutic effect, but this is not certain. Larger well-designed trials are needed to enable safe conclusions.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyExercise TherapyAdultFecal IncontinenceHumansPelvic Floor

Identifiers

PMID10796859
OpenAlexW4247499221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.