Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796855›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Single dose oral aspirin for acute pain.

J E Edwards, A Oldman, L Smith, S L Collins, D Carroll, P J Wiffen, H J McQuay, R A Moore

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single dose oral aspirin for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Single dose oral ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Single dose oral diclofenac for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis.Health care management science · 2008
    Article
  17. Intravenous parecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J E EdwardsPain Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LJ. jayne.edwards@pru.ox.ac.uk
A Oldman
L Smith
S L Collins
D Carroll
P J Wiffen
H J McQuay
R A Moore
University of Oxford · GBChurchill Hospital · GBCochrane · GBOxford Brookes University · GBPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspirin has been known to be an effective analgesic for many years and is commonly used throughout the world for many different pain conditions. It is important for both prescribers and patients to have the best possible information about the efficacy and safety of analgesics, and this need is reflected in patient surveys which show that postoperative pain is often poorly managed. We also need to benchmark relative efficacy and safety of current analgesics so that we can compare them with new analgesics.

objectivesTo quantitatively assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of a single-dose of aspirin in acute pain of moderate to severe intensity. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised trials were identified by searching Medline (1966 to March 1998), Embase (1980 to January 1998), the Cochrane Library (Issue 1,1998) and the Oxford Pain Relief Database (1950 to 1994). SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria used were: full journal publication, postoperative pain or a mixture of postoperative and acute trauma pain, oral administration, adult patients, baseline pain of moderate to severe intensity, double-blind design, and random allocation to treatment groups which compared aspirin with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Summed pain relief or pain intensity difference over four to six hours was extracted, and converted into dichotomous information yielding the number of patients with at least 50% pain relief. This was then used to calculate the relative benefit and the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief. MAIN

resultsSeventy-two randomised single-dose trials met our inclusion criteria, with 3253 patients given aspirin, and 3297 placebo. Significant benefit of aspirin over placebo was shown for aspirin 600/650 mg, 1000 mg and 1200 mg, NNTs for at least 50% pain relief of 4.4 (4.0 to 4.9), 4.0 (3.2 to 5.4) and 2.4 (1.9 to 3.2) respectively. Single-dose aspirin 600/650 mg produced significantly more drowsiness and gastric irritation than placebo, with a number-needed-to-harm (NNH) of 28 (19 to 52) and 38 (22 to 174) respectively. Type of pain model, pain measurement, sample size, quality of study design, and study duration had no significant impact on the results. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAspirin is an effective analgesic for acute pain of moderate to severe intensity with a clear dose-response. Drowsiness and gastric irritation were seen as significant adverse effects even though the studies were single-dose. The pain relief achieved with aspirin was very similar milligram for milligram to that seen with paracetamol.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAspirinHumansPainAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAspirin

Identifiers

PMID10796855
OpenAlexW2119267835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.