Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796837›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Neonatal screening for sickle cell disease.

C M Lees, S Davies, C Dezateux

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. A Newborn Screening Program for Sickle Cell Disease in Murcia (Spain).International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Current modalities of sickle cell disease management.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C M LeesEvidence Based Child Health Unit, Institute of Child Health, Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, Eaton Rd, Liverpool, UK, L12 2AP. cmlees@liverpool.ac.uk
S Davies
C Dezateux

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSickle cell disease is an inherited disorder that occurs throughout the world with its highest incidence in areas of Africa where malaria is endemic. It affects up to one in 60 infants born in some areas of Africa. There are a number of potentially serious complications associated with the condition, and it is suggested that early treatment (before symptoms develop) can improve both morbidity and mortality. Screening for the condition in the neonatal period would enable early diagnosis and therefore early treatment.

objectivesTo assess whether there is evidence that neonatal screening for sickle cell disease rather than symptomatic diagnosis reduces adverse short and long term outcomes for those in whom the disease is detected, without adverse outcomes in the population screened. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Controlled Trials Register of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group (See Group search strategy). Contact was made with experts in the field for any work as yet unpublished and reference lists of published studies were also searched. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised or pseudorandomised trial, published or unpublished comparing diagnosis by screening to clinical diagnosis would have been considered eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No trials of neonatal screening for sickle cell disease were found. MAIN

resultsNo trials of neonatal screening for sickle cell disease were found. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is a lack of evidence from trials of neonatal screening for sickle cell disease. There is evidence of benefit from early treatment which is made possible by screening and there are a number of reviews and economic analyses of non-trial literature suggesting that screening is appropriate. Health care providers must therefore assess whether the information provided by these documents is relevant to their practice and situation when making decisions regarding neonatal screening for sickle cell disease. Systematic reviews of early treatments/interventions, including penicillin prophylaxis, pneumococcal vaccine and parental education should be considered.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAnemia, Sickle CellHumansInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID10796837
PMCPMC8406994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.