Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796799›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Tyrosine supplementation for phenylketonuria.

V J Poustie, P Rutherford

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V J PoustieEvidence Based Child Health Unit, Institute of Child Health, Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital NHS Trust, Alder Hey, Eaton Road, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L12 2AP. v.poustie@liv.ac.uk
P Rutherford
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenylketonuria is an inherited disease for which the main treatment is the dietary restriction of the amino acid phenylalanine. The diet has to be initiated in the neonatal period to prevent or reduce mental handicap however the diet is very restrictive and unpalatable and can be difficult to follow. A deficiency of the amino acid tyrosine has been suggested as a cause of some of the neuropsychological problems exhibited in PKU. Therefore, this review aims to assess the efficasy of tyrosine supplementation for phenylketonuria.

objectivesTo assess the effects of tyrosine supplementation alongside or instead of phenylalanine restricted diet for patients with phenylketonuria who commenced on diet at diagnosis and either continued on the diet or relaxed the diet later in life. To assess the evidence that tyrosine supplementation alongside, or instead of phenylalanine restricted diet improves intelligence, neuropsychological performance, growth and nutritional status, mortality rate and quality of life. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Trials Register which is a specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional studies were identified from handsearching the Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (from inception, 1978, to 1998). The manufacturers of prescribable dietary products used in the treatment of phenylketonuria were also contacted for further references. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or pseudo-randomised trials investigating the use of tyrosine supplementation versus placebo in patients with phenylketonuria in addition to, or instead of, a phenylalanine restricted diet. Patients treated for maternal phenylketonuria were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted the data. MAIN

resultsTwo trials were included with a total of 47 patients. The blood tyrosine concentrations were significantly higher in the patients receiving tyrosine supplements than those in the placebo group (weighted mean difference 22.526, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 12.182 - 32.870). No significant differences were found between any of the other outcomes measured. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsFrom the available evidence no recommendations can be made about whether tyrosine supplementation should be introduced into routine clinical practice. Further randomised controlled studies are required to provide further evidence.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHumansPhenylketonuriasTyrosineTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID10796799
OpenAlexW1906748580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.