SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Corticosteroids for treating Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcome of Guillain-Barré syndrome.Neurocritical care · 2006Article
- Intravenous immunoglobulin in therapy of peripheral neuropathy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2005Review
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Current treatment options in neurology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cause of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is inflammation of the peripheral nerves which corticosteroids would be expected to benefit.
objectivesTo examine the efficacy of corticosteroids in hastening recovery and reducing the long term morbidity from Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register for randomised trials and enquiry from authors of trials and other experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials TYPES OF
participantspatients with GBS of all ages and all degrees of severity Types of interventions: any form of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone Types of outcome measures: Primary: improvement in disability grade on a commonly used seven point scale four weeks after randomisation Secondary: time from randomisation until recovery of unaided walking, time from randomisation until discontinuation of ventilation (for those ventilated), mortality, proportion of patients dead or disabled (unable to walk without aid) after 12 months, improvement in disability grade after six months, improvement in disability grade after 12 months, proportion of patients who relapse, and proportion of patients with adverse events related to corticosteroid treatment DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified six randomised trials. One author extracted the data and the other checked them. We obtained some missing data from investigators. MAIN
resultsThe six eligible trials included a total of 195 corticosteroid treated patients and 187 control subjects. One trial of intravenous methylprednisolone accounted for 243 of the total 382 subjects studied (63%). This trial did not show a significant difference in any disability related outcome between the corticosteroid and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid and control groups for the primary outcome measure, improvement in disability grade four weeks after randomisation. The weighted mean difference of the three trials for which this outcome was available showed no difference. The actual figure was 0.01 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.29) grade in favour of the corticosteroid group. There was also no significant difference between the groups for most of the secondary outcome measures. However in the largest trial hypertension developed less often in the intravenous methylprednisolone group (2/124, 1.6%) than in the control group (12/118, 10.2%), a significant difference in favour of corticosteroid treatment (relative risk 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.66). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsCorticosteroids should not be used in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome. If a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome needs corticosteroid treatment for some other reason its use will probably not do harm. The effect of intravenous methylprednisolone combined with intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré syndrome is being tested with a randomised trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.