Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796795›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Corticosteroids for treating Guillain-Barré syndrome.

R A Hughes, F G van der Meché

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intravenous immunoglobulin in therapy of peripheral neuropathy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2005
    Review
  3. Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Current treatment options in neurology · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

R A HughesDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Hodgkin Building, Guy's Hospital, London, UK, SE1 9RT. richard.a.hughes@kcl.ac.uk
F G van der Meché
Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cause of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is inflammation of the peripheral nerves which corticosteroids would be expected to benefit.

objectivesTo examine the efficacy of corticosteroids in hastening recovery and reducing the long term morbidity from Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register for randomised trials and enquiry from authors of trials and other experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials TYPES OF

participantspatients with GBS of all ages and all degrees of severity Types of interventions: any form of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone Types of outcome measures: Primary: improvement in disability grade on a commonly used seven point scale four weeks after randomisation Secondary: time from randomisation until recovery of unaided walking, time from randomisation until discontinuation of ventilation (for those ventilated), mortality, proportion of patients dead or disabled (unable to walk without aid) after 12 months, improvement in disability grade after six months, improvement in disability grade after 12 months, proportion of patients who relapse, and proportion of patients with adverse events related to corticosteroid treatment DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified six randomised trials. One author extracted the data and the other checked them. We obtained some missing data from investigators. MAIN

resultsThe six eligible trials included a total of 195 corticosteroid treated patients and 187 control subjects. One trial of intravenous methylprednisolone accounted for 243 of the total 382 subjects studied (63%). This trial did not show a significant difference in any disability related outcome between the corticosteroid and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid and control groups for the primary outcome measure, improvement in disability grade four weeks after randomisation. The weighted mean difference of the three trials for which this outcome was available showed no difference. The actual figure was 0.01 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.29) grade in favour of the corticosteroid group. There was also no significant difference between the groups for most of the secondary outcome measures. However in the largest trial hypertension developed less often in the intravenous methylprednisolone group (2/124, 1.6%) than in the control group (12/118, 10.2%), a significant difference in favour of corticosteroid treatment (relative risk 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.66). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsCorticosteroids should not be used in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome. If a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome needs corticosteroid treatment for some other reason its use will probably not do harm. The effect of intravenous methylprednisolone combined with intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré syndrome is being tested with a randomised trial.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsGlucocorticoidsGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansSteroidsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGlucocorticoidsSteroids

Identifiers

PMID10796795
OpenAlexW2400570006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.