SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Epidermal growth factor receptor blockers for the treatment of ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- DNA-repair pathway inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Evaluation of ovarian cancer remission markers HE4, MMP7 and Mesothelin by comparison to the established marker CA125.Gynecologic oncology · 2012Trial
- Development and validation of pathomics signature for predicting prognosis of advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients after platinum-based chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of plant-based interventions on gynecological cancers: a narrative review of mechanistic interplays and clinical evidence.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Outcome of patients with peritoneal metastasis from ovarian cancer treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC).Pleura and peritoneum · 2024Article
- Histopathologic image-based deep learning classifier for predicting platinum-based treatment responses in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Relationships between CD34-, CD105- and bcl-2-Expression Levels and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Based Differential Diagnosis of Adnexal Tumours.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Deciphering serous ovarian carcinoma histopathology and platinum response by convolutional neural networks.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Chemotherapy Resistance in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients.Biomarkers in cancer · 2019Review
- Markers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Ascites and Plasma in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive, Platinum-Resistant, and Platinum-Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2017Article
- In vitro chemosensitivity in ovarian carcinoma: Comparison of three leading assays.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2016Article
- Scope of nanotechnology in ovarian cancer therapeutics.Journal of ovarian research · 2010Article
- Ovarian cancer: the duplicity of CA125 measurement.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOvarian carcinoma is the seventh most common cancer of women in the world and is responsible for the greatest number of deaths from gynaecological malignancy in Europe and North America. Although many studies have explored the use of chemotherapy in this disease, most individual trials have been too small to show clear benefit of one type of chemotherapy over another.
objectivesThe type and intensity of chemotherapy used routinely for women with advanced ovarian cancer has varied because of uncertainty about the effectiveness of the different regimens. The objective of this review was to compare single drugs versus combinations of drugs, platinum versus non-platinum, and carboplatin versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search strategy: We searched MEDLINE, and CancerLit bibliographic databases and the National Cancer Institute and the UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research registers of trials. We also handsearched the proceedings of meetings and contacted experts in the field and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of: (1) single non-platinum versus non-platinum combination chemotherapy (2) single non-platinum versus platinum combination chemotherapy (3) non-platinum regimen versus the same regimen plus cisplatin (4) single platinum versus platinum combination chemotherapy (5) cisplatin versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Individual patient data were obtained from the trial investigators, checked by the reviewers and finally verified by the trial investigator. MAIN
resultsMain results: 49 trials involving 8763 women were included. The data were combined to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for survival on an intention-to-treat basis. For single non-platinum versus platinum combination chemotherapy the overall HR for survival was 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.05 in favour of platinum-based combination chemotherapy. For non-platinum regimens compared with the same regimen plus cisplatin the survival HR was 0.88, 95% CI 0.79- 0.98 in favour of the addition of platinum to drug regimens. Single platinum compared with platinum combination therapy gave a HR of 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.05 in favour of combination chemotherapy. Cisplatin versus carboplatin gave a HR of 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.12. Sub-group analyses for age, stage, grade, histology, resection, bulk of residual tumour and performance status were undertaken for cisplatin versus carboplatin only. No difference in effect was found. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe available evidence, although not conclusive, suggests that platinum-based chemotherapy is better than non-platinum therapy. There is some evidence that combination therapy improves survival compared with platinum alone. No difference in effect has been shown between cisplatin and carboplatin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.