SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Vaccines for preventing infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccines for preventing infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Safety and immunogenicity of an oral inactivated whole-cell pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine administered to healthy human subjects.Infection and immunity · 2006Article
- Protection against P. aeruginosa with an adenovirus vector containing an OprF epitope in the capsid.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of vaccination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or pseudorandomised trials (published or unpublished) comparing Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccines (oral, parenteral or intranasal) with control vaccines or no intervention in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned to assess the following outcomes: time to infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pulmonary function, body mass index, Schwachman score, frequency of pulmonary infective exacerbations, days of antibiotic usage, days unable to carry out normal daily activities, adverse events, mortality, antibody levels to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and T cell proliferation and cytokine production in response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MAIN
resultsOne trial which included 17 vaccinated patients, with follow up reported to 10 years met the inclusion criteria. Finding only a single trial, and the lack of information on our predefined outcomes limited analysis. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is a paucity of randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of vaccination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. Increased understanding of modulation of the immune response by vaccination has led to the development of alternative vaccines. We suggest that there is an urgent need for newer vaccines to be evaluated in adequately-powered, multicentre randomised controlled trials examining clinically relevant end-points in addition to immunological variables. Such a trial should assess effectiveness over several years, and include follow-up of vaccinees who become colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.