SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Naltrexone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite widespread use of naltrexone maintenance in many countries for more than ten years now (e.g., USA since 1984, UK since 1988) a sound documentation of the research on this drug is still missing.
objectivesTo evaluate the effects of naltrexone maintenance treatment in preventing relapse in opioid addicts after detoxification. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CCTR and handsearched the "Bolletino per le Farmacodipendenze e l'Alcolismo"; contact was sought with pharmaceutical producers of naltrexone, with authors and other CRGs; references of obtained studies. Trials were reliably identified and data extracted. Date of most recent searches: June 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: All studies controlled for naltrexone; treatment of heroin addicts after detoxification with naltrexone. Studies were classified into three categories (high, moderate or low risk of bias) according to their methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reviewers evaluated data independently and analysed outcome measures taking into consideration adherence to and success of the study intervention. Data was extracted and analysed stratifying for the three categories of study quality. Where possible, meta-analysis was performed. MAIN
resultsEleven studies were included in this review, and not all of them were randomised. Meta-analysis could be done to a low degree only, because the studies and their outcomes were very heterogeneous. The result of this quantitative analysis was statistically poor, and so was the methodological quality of the included studies. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe available trials do not allow a final evaluation of naltrexone maintenance treatment yet. A trend in favour of treatment with naltrexone was observed for certain target groups, as described in the literature before. A well-done clinical trial is needed in order to get better evidence as soon as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10796779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.