SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Interventions for emergency contraception.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for emergency contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions for emergency contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.International journal of women's health · 2010Article
- Do Indonesian medical practitioners approve the availability of emergency contraception over-the-counter? A survey of general practitioners and obstetricians in Jakarta.BMC women's health · 2005Article
- [After levonorgestrel, will mifepristone (RU486) be the next day-after pill?].Atencion primaria · 2001Review
- Improving access to emergency contraception.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine which emergency contraceptive method following unprotected intercourse is the most effective, safe and convenient for use in preventing pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The search strategy included electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Popline, Chinese biomedical databases and HRP emergency contraception database. In addition, references of retrieved papers were searched and researchers in the field and two pharmaceutical companies were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized studies including women attending services for emergency contraception following a single act of unprotected intercourse were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on outcomes and trial characteristics were extracted in duplicate by two reviewers. Results were expressed as relative risk using a fixed-effects model with 95 % confidence interval. MAIN
resultsFifteen trials were included in the review. The majority (8/15) of the trials were conducted in China. Most comparisons between different interventions included one or two trials although some trials were appropriately sized with power calculations. Levonorgestrel appears to be more effective than Yuzpe regimen (2 trials, RR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.31-0.84) and causes less side-effects (RR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 0.84). Levonorgestrel was less effective than locally manufactured mifepristone in a single, large Chinese study (RR: 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.00 to 4.77). Effectiveness of different doses of mifepristone seem to be similar but the frequency of delay in onset of the subsequent menstrual period increases with increased dose. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsLevonorgestrel and mifepristone seem to offer the highest efficacy with an acceptable side-effect profile. One disadvantage of mifepristone is that it causes delays in onset of subsequent menses which may induce anxiety. However, this seems to be dose-related and low doses of mifepristone minimise this side-effect without compromising effectiveness. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of mifepristone with levonorgestrel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.