Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796774›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections.

R G Jepson, L Mihaljevic, J Craig

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R G Jepson15 Blackwood Crescent, Edinburgh, UK, EH9 1QZ. ruthj@ibm.net
L Mihaljevic
J Craig
Blackwood · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCranberries (particularly in the form of cranberry juice) have been used widely for several decades for the prevention and treatment of urinary tract infections. The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of cranberries in preventing such infections.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of cranberry juice and other cranberry products in preventing urinary tract infections in susceptible populations. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases and the Internet were searched using English and non English language terms; companies involved with the promotion and distribution of cranberry preparations were contacted; reference lists of review articles and relevant trials were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi randomised controlled trials of cranberry juice/products for the prevention of urinary tract infections in susceptible populations. Trials of men, women or children were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reviewers RJ and LM independently assessed and extracted information using specially designed data extraction forms. For each included trial, information was collected on methods of the trial, participants, interventions and outcomes. We were unable to perform statistical analysis due to the nature of the data available for review. MAIN

resultsFour trials met the inclusion criteria (three cross-over, one parallel group). Three compared the effectiveness of cranberry juice versus placebo juice or water and one compared the effectiveness of cranberry capsules versus placebo. Two further trials were excluded. The outcomes of interest were number of urinary tract infections in each group (symptomatic and asymptomatic), side effects and adherence to therapy. Data from three out of the four trials indicated that cranberries were effective for at least one of the outcomes of interest. The quality of the four included trials was poor, however, and thus the reliability of the results must be questionable. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe small number of poor quality trials gives no reliable evidence of the effectiveness of cranberry juice and other cranberry products. The large number of dropouts/withdrawals from the trials indicates that cranberry juice may not be acceptable over long periods of time. Other cranberry products such as cranberry capsules may be more acceptable. On the basis of the available evidence, cranberry juice cannot be recommended for the prevention of urinary tract infections in susceptible populations. Further properly designed trials with relevant outcomes are needed.

Indexed as

PhytotherapyBeveragesFruitHumansUrinary Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID10796774
OpenAlexW4255351632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.