Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796731›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Modern combined oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis.

J Moore, S Kennedy, A Prentice

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Progestagens for pain symptoms associated with endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Chinese herbal medicine for endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Regular review: Endometriosis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J MooreNuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 9DU. stephen.kennedy@obstetrics-gynaecology.oxford.ac.uk
S Kennedy
A Prentice
University of Oxford · GBRosie Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a major women's health-care problem. It causes pain and/or infertility, and affects millions of women worldwide. Endometriosis is defined according to histological criteria by the presence of tissue resembling endometrium in sites outside the uterus, most commonly the ovaries and peritoneum. The aim of treatment has been to remove the deposits of ectopic endometrium that are thought to be responsible for the symptoms of endometriosis. This can be achieved surgically by destroying or removing the implants; medical therapies induce atrophy within the hormonally-dependent ectopic endometrium. The duration of hormonal treatment may be limited by unwanted side effects. There is some evidence, however, from epidemiological research that current use of the combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is associated with a reduced incidence of endometriosis. The combined pill has the great advantage over other hormonal treatments that it can be taken indefinitely.

objectivesThe aim of this review was to establish the role of modern oral contraceptives in the management of painful symptoms ascribed to endometriosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: The search strategy of the Menstrual Disorders Group was utilised to identify all randomised trials of the use of oral contraceptives in the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. In addition a search of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was undertaken together with approaches to pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All truly randomised controlled trials of the use of oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of women of reproductive age with symptoms ascribed to the diagnosis of endometriosis made visually at a surgical procedure, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study quality assessment and data extraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. One of the assessors was an expert in the content matter. MAIN

resultsOnly one study was identified which satisfied the inclusion criteria. The oral contraceptive used in a conventional manner was less effective than a GnRH analogue in the relief of dysmenorrhoea. No significant difference was noted between the effectiveness of the oral contraceptive pill and a GnRH analogue in the relief of dyspareunia or non-menstrual pain. Headaches and weight gain were more commonly associated with oral contraceptive usage than with GnRH analogue usage whereas hot flushes, insomnia and vaginal dryness were less common. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is a paucity of data relating to the use of oral contraceptive preparations in the treatment of symptomtic endometriosis. The data such as it is supports the common practice of the use of the oral contraceptive pill as a first line therapy but further research is required to fully evaluate its role in the management of endometriosis.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, OralEndometriosisFemaleHumansPelvic PainContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID10796731
OpenAlexW1625513163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.