Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796716›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Oral calorie supplements for cystic fibrosis.

R Smyth, S Walters

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R SmythInstitute of Child health, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L12 2AP. r.l.smyth@liv.ac.uk
S Walters
Alder Hey Children's Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor nutrition occurs frequently in children and adults with cystic fibrosis and is associated with a number of other adverse outcomes. Oral calorie supplements are used to try and increase total daily calorie intake and improve weight gain. However, they are expensive and there are concerns that they may lead to a reduction in the amount of food eaten and no overall improvement in energy intake.

objectivesTo examine the evidence that in patients with cystic fibrosis, oral calorie supplements increase daily calorie intake, improve overall nutritional intake, nutritional indices, lung function, survival and quality of life. To assess possible adverse effects associated with use of oral calorie supplements. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. The companies which market oral calorie supplements were also contacted. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing use of oral calorie supplements for at least one month to increase calorie intake with no specific intervention or additional nutritional advice in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The following outcomes were assessed: indices of nutrition and growth, anthropometric measures of body composition, calorie intake (total, from oral calorie supplements and from food), nutrient intake, eating behaviour, quality of life, specific adverse effects, lung function and mortality. MAIN

resultsTwo trials which reported results from a total of 29 patients were suitable for inclusion in the review. From the data provided in the published reports only one item (change in weight) could be extracted from one trial for inclusion in the review. This showed no difference between intervention and comparison group. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsOral calorie supplements are very widely used around the world in an attempt to improve nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis, at some considerable cost. It is therefore very disappointing that their effectiveness has not been assessed by adequate clinical trials. No conclusions can be made about the use of oral calorie supplements in cystic fibrosis from the information currently available and clinicians must balance potential benefits against possible adverse effects of treatment in making decisions about individual patients. This systematic review has clearly identified the need for a well designed, adequately-powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness and possible adverse effects of oral calorie supplements in cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisDietary SupplementsEnergy IntakeAdultChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID10796716
OpenAlexW4241971935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.