Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796711›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men.

B J Cohlen, P Vandekerckhove, E R te Velde, J D Habbema

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03006523 (Impact of Inseminated Volume and Live Birth Rates After Intrauterine Insemination), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03006523 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Inseminated Volume and Live Birth Rates After Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) With Donor Sperm (dIUI): A Prospective Randomized COntrolled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion DexeusRan2013 to 2016Enrolled293ConditionsInfertility, Infertility, Male, Same-Sex Marriage, Parent, SingleArmsIntrauterine insemination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Outcomes after intrauterine insemination are independent of provider type.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2006
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

B J CohlenDepartment of Reproductive medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX. assgyn@diakhuis.nl
P Vandekerckhove
E R te Velde
J D Habbema
Cochrane · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used, however its effectiveness remains a matter of debate. Although IUI is less invasive and expensive than IVF or GIFT, it should only be applied if the probability of conception is improved significantly as compared to the natural chance of conceiving. To increase the number of available oocytes at the site of fertilization, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) can be applied in conjunction with IUI. Uncontrolled studies suggest a beneficial effect of COH in combination with IUI, also when a male factor is present. To be able to draw firm conclusions whether IUI and/or COH improve the probability of conception, several comparisons should be performed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

objectivesTo determine for male subfertility whether intrauterine insemination (IUI) improves the probability of conception compared with timed intercourse and whether the addition of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influences the results. SEARCH STRATEGY: 1. The specialist database of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. 2. Medline search. 3. Embase search. 4. DDFU search. 5. BIOSIS search. 6. SCIsearch. 7. Manual searching of references mentioned in the obtained studies. 8. Personal communication and write letters to experts (14) in the field. 9. Abstracts of The American Society for Reproductive Medicine and European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Meetings. When important information is lacking from the original publications the authors will be contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Independently by the first 2 authors: 1. Trial design characteristics. 2. Baseline characteristics of participants. 3. Types of intervention. 4. Outcomes where pregnancy is the outcome of main interest. Number of multiple pregnancies and number of cycles with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) are secondary outcomes. Analysis of agreement between the two observers was determined for the following items: inclusion or exclusion of a trial, method of randomization, definition of male subfertility, design of the trial, number of pregnancies and completed cycles. Sensitivity analysis is performed. MAIN

resultsSeventeen trials fulfilled the selection criteria for this review and were included. Four trials are pending. Crude agreement concerning inclusion or exclusion of trials occurred for 41 of 43 (95%) trials reviewed (kappa 0.90). The included trials comprised 3,662 completed cycles. In natural cycles intrauterine insemination (IUI) significantly improved the probability of conception compared with timed intercourse (TI) (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 2.43, 1.54 - 3.83). In cycles with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) IUI significantly improved the probability of conception also compared with TI (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 2.14, 1.30 - 3.51). Despite clinical heterogeneity, these results are based on strong evidence. Intrauterine insemination in cycles with COH improved the probability of conception compared with IUI in natural cycles but significance was not reached (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 1.79, 0.98 - 3.25). Comparing IUI in COH-cycles with TI in natural cycles the first treatment modality significantly improved the probability of conception (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 6.23, 2.35 - 16.52). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsIntra-uterine insemination offers couples with male subfertility benefit over timed intercourse, both in natural cycles and in cycles with COH. In the case of a severe semen defect (with more than 1 million motile sperm after semen preparation and no triple sperm defect) IUI in natural cycles should be the treatment of first choice. The value of COH need to be further investigated in RCTs. Mild ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotrophins is advised in cases with less sever

Indexed as

CoitusFertilizationInsemination, ArtificialOvulation InductionFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID10796711
OpenAlexW2139463154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.