Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796689›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Barbiturates for acute traumatic brain injury.

I Roberts

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis and cerebral oedema: a systematic review.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sedation in traumatic brain injury.Emergency medicine international · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emerging treatments for traumatic brain injury.Expert opinion on emerging drugs · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

I RobertsDepartment of Epidemiology, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK, WC1N 1EH. Ian.roberts@ich.ucl.ac.uk
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRaised intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important complication of severe brain injury, and is associated with a high mortality rate. Barbiturates are believed to reduce intracranial pressure by suppressing cerebral metabolism, thus reducing cerebral metabolic demands and cerebral blood volume. However, barbiturates also reduce blood pressure and therefore may adversely effect cerebral perfusion pressure.

objectivesTo assess the effects of barbiturates in reducing raised intracranial pressure, mortality and morbidity in people with acute traumatic brain injury. To quantify any side effects resulting from the use of barbiturates. SEARCH STRATEGY: The review draws largely on the search strategy developed for the Cochrane Injuries Group as a whole. However, in addition the Cochrane Library was searched in December 1996 using the text terms "barbiturate*," "pentobarb*," "phenobarb*," "head," and "brain." An updated search was done in April 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi randomised trials of any one or more of the barbiturate class of drugs (amobarbital, barbital, hexobarbital, mephobarbital, methohexital, murexide, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, thiobarbiturate) where study participants had a clinically diagnosed acute traumatic brain injury of any severity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewer extracted the data and assessed the quality of allocation concealment in the trials. MAIN

resultsThe pooled relative risk for death (barbiturate vs no barbiturate) was 1.09 (95%CI 0.81 to 1.47). The pooled effect of barbiturates on adverse neurological outcome, measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (death, persistent vegetative state or severe disability) was 1.15 (95% 0.81 to 1.64). Two studies examined the effect of barbiturate therapy on intracranial pressure. In the study by Eisenberger et al, a smaller proportion of patients in the barbiturate group had uncontrolled ICP (68% vs 83%). The relative risk for uncontrolled ICP was 0.81 (95%CI 0.62 to 1.06). Similarly, in the study by Ward et al, mean ICP was lower in the barbiturate treated group. Barbiturate therapy results in an increase in the occurrence of hypotension (RR=1.80 95%CI 1.19 to 2.70). For every four patients treated one will develop clinically significant hypotension. Mean body temperature was significantly lower in the barbiturate treated group. Schwartz et al compared pentobarbital with mannitol in the control of intracranial pressure. Pentobarbital was less effective than mannitol for control of raised ICP. 68% of patients in the pentobarbital treated group required a second drug for the treatment of raised intracranial pressure compared to 39% in the mannitol treated group (RR=1.75 95%CI 1.05 to 2.92). There was no substantial difference in mortality between the two study groups (RR=1.18 95%CI 0.73 to 1.92). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is no evidence that barbiturate therapy in patients with acute severe head injury improves outcome. Barbiturate therapy results in a fall in blood pressure in 1 in 4 treated patients. The hypotensive effect of barbiturate therapy will offset any ICP lowering effect on cerebral perfusion pressure.

Indexed as

BarbituratesBrain InjuriesCentral Nervous System AgentsCerebrovascular CirculationHumansIntracranial HypertensionRiskBarbituratesCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID10796689
OpenAlexW4212937058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.