Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796663›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers.

J E Jones, E A Nelson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Research Progress of Hydrogel Microneedles in Wound Management.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J E JonesNorth Sefton and West Lancashire Community Trust, Churchtown Community Clinic, 137 Cambridge Road, Southport, Merseyside, UK, PR9 7LT.
E A Nelson
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous leg ulceration is a common, recurring, disabling condition affecting up to 1% of adults. Treatment is aimed at healing with simple dressings and compression bandages / stockings. Unfortunately in some cases this treatment is unsuccessful with ulcers remaining open for months or years. In order to stimulate healing, some clinicians use skin grafts. These skin grafts may be taken from the patients own uninjured skin (e.g. thigh), may be grown from the patient's skin cells into a dressing, (both known as autografts) or applied as a sheet of bioengineered skin grown from a donor cells (known as an allograft). Preserved skin from other animals, e.g. pigs, have also been used and these are known as xerografts.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of skin grafts in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Groups specialised register (date of search October 1999), and reference lists of relevant articles. We hand searched relevant journals and conference proceedings, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating skin grafts in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. There was no restriction on articles based on language or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and assessment of study quality was undertaken by two reviewers independently. Trials with similar patients, comparisons, and outcomes were pooled. MAIN

resultsSeven RCTs of skin grafts for venous leg ulcers were identified. In 6 trials patients also received compression bandaging. Two trials (98 patients) evaluated split thickness autografts, three trials (92 patients) evaluated cultured keratinocyte allografts, one compared tissue engineered skin (artificial skin) with a dressing (309 patients) and one compared it with a split thickness skin graft (7 patients, 13 ulcers). The trials comparing artificial skin with a dressing reported a significantly higher proportion of ulcers healing with artificial skin. There was insufficient evidence from the remaining trials to determine whether other types of skin grafting increased the healing of venous ulcers. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is limited evidence that artificial skin used in conjunction with compression bandaging, increases the chance of healing a venous ulcer compared to compression alone. Further research is needed to assess whether other forms of skin grafts increase ulcer healing.

Indexed as

Skin TransplantationAdultHumansLeg UlcerTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID10796663
OpenAlexW4233453395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.