SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- [European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack. Part 1].Der Nervenarzt · 2008Guideline
- Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2005Pooled it
- Home versus day rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.Age and ageing · 2008Trial
- Multidisciplinary care in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024Article
- The choices facing geriatrics.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2012Article
- Role of occupational therapy after stroke.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeriatric day hospitals provide multi-disciplinary rehabilitation in an outpatient setting. Concern has been expressed that evidence for effectiveness is equivocal and that day hospital care is expensive.
objectivesTo assess the effects of medical day hospitals for elderly people. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Sigle, Bids, and Cinahl up to January 1997, and reference lists of articles. We also searched Index Medicus and International Dissertation Abstracts up to January 1997. We contacted authors of previous studies of day hospital care. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing geriatric medical day hospitals with alternative forms of care. The participants were elderly medical patients. The outcomes were death, place of residence, dependency, global 'poor' outcome (death, institutionalisation or dependency), activities of daily (ADL) score, subjective health status, patient satisfaction, and resource use. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN
resultsTwelve studies were included involving 22 day hospitals and 2867 patients. Five studies compared day hospital with comprehensive elderly care, four compared day hospital with domiciliary care and three compared day hospital with no comprehensive elderly care. There were no significant differences between day hospital attendance and comparison treatments for the outcomes of death, death or requiring institutional care, death or deterioration in ADL. When death or a 'poor' outcome at follow up was examined there was a significant difference in favour of day hospital attendance when compared to no comprehensive elderly care (odds ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.00; P < 0.05). Dependency was measured in 11 studies using a variety of ADL measures; two described short-term improvement for the day hospital group, one reported improved outcome for the comparison group, while in the remainder there was no statistically significant difference. Using the outcome of deterioration in ADL among survivors, day hospital patients showed reduced odds of deterioration compared with those receiving no comprehensive elderly care (0.60; 0.38-0.97; P <0.05). When resource use was examined the day hospital group showed trends towards reductions in hospital bed use and placement of survivors in institutional care. Nine studies comparing treatment costs indicated that day hospital attendance was a more expensive option, although only two analyses took into account long-term care costs. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsMedical day hospital care for the elderly appears to be more effective than no intervention but may have no clear advantage over other forms of comprehensive elderly medical services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.