Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796660›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care.

A Forster, J Young, P Langhorne

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2005
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Multidisciplinary care in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Article
  6. The choices facing geriatrics.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2012
    Article
  7. Role of occupational therapy after stroke.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A ForsterHealth Care for the Elderly, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, UK, BD5 ONA. a.forster@leeds.ac.uk
J Young
P Langhorne
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt. Luke's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric day hospitals provide multi-disciplinary rehabilitation in an outpatient setting. Concern has been expressed that evidence for effectiveness is equivocal and that day hospital care is expensive.

objectivesTo assess the effects of medical day hospitals for elderly people. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Sigle, Bids, and Cinahl up to January 1997, and reference lists of articles. We also searched Index Medicus and International Dissertation Abstracts up to January 1997. We contacted authors of previous studies of day hospital care. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing geriatric medical day hospitals with alternative forms of care. The participants were elderly medical patients. The outcomes were death, place of residence, dependency, global 'poor' outcome (death, institutionalisation or dependency), activities of daily (ADL) score, subjective health status, patient satisfaction, and resource use. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN

resultsTwelve studies were included involving 22 day hospitals and 2867 patients. Five studies compared day hospital with comprehensive elderly care, four compared day hospital with domiciliary care and three compared day hospital with no comprehensive elderly care. There were no significant differences between day hospital attendance and comparison treatments for the outcomes of death, death or requiring institutional care, death or deterioration in ADL. When death or a 'poor' outcome at follow up was examined there was a significant difference in favour of day hospital attendance when compared to no comprehensive elderly care (odds ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.00; P < 0.05). Dependency was measured in 11 studies using a variety of ADL measures; two described short-term improvement for the day hospital group, one reported improved outcome for the comparison group, while in the remainder there was no statistically significant difference. Using the outcome of deterioration in ADL among survivors, day hospital patients showed reduced odds of deterioration compared with those receiving no comprehensive elderly care (0.60; 0.38-0.97; P <0.05). When resource use was examined the day hospital group showed trends towards reductions in hospital bed use and placement of survivors in institutional care. Nine studies comparing treatment costs indicated that day hospital attendance was a more expensive option, although only two analyses took into account long-term care costs. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsMedical day hospital care for the elderly appears to be more effective than no intervention but may have no clear advantage over other forms of comprehensive elderly medical services.

Indexed as

Day Care, MedicalGeriatricsAgedHealth Services ResearchHome Care ServicesHumans

Identifiers

PMID10796660
OpenAlexW2169830532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.