SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Mucolytic agents for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Pooled it
- Antitussive drugs--past, present, and future.Pharmacological reviews · 2014Review
- COPD exacerbations. 4: Prevention.Thorax · 2006Review
- Pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2006Review
- Focus on antioxidant enzymes and antioxidant strategies in smoking related airway diseases.Thorax · 2005Review
- Drug reimbursement: indicators of inappropriate resource allocation.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer recurrent exacerbations with an increase in volume and/or purulence of sputum and any therapy that reduced the number of exacerbations would be useful. There is a marked difference between countries in terms of the prescribing of mucolytics depending on whether or not they are perceived to be effective.
objectivesTo assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable chronic bronchitis or COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials that compared oral mucolytic therapy with placebo for at least two months in adults with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Studies of people with asthma and cystic fibrosis were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted data. Study authors and drug companies were contacted for missing information. MAIN
resultsTwenty two trials were included. Compared with placebo, there was a significant reduction in the number of exacerbations per patient with oral mucolytics (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.067 per month, 95% confidence interval -0.079, -0.055, p<0.001) which is a 29% reduction. The annualised rate of exacerbations in the control patients was 2.7 per year. The number of days of disability also fell on mucolytic therapy (WMD -0.56, 95% confidence interval -0.77, -0.35, p<0.001). The number of patients who remained exacerbation-free was greater in the mucolytic group thanin the placebo group (OR 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.93, 2.54, p<0.001). There was no difference in lung function or in adverse effects reported between treatments. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIn subjects with chronic bronchitis or COPD, treatment with mucolytics was associated with a small reduction in acute exacerbations and a somewhat greater reduction in total number of days of disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.