SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07505147 (A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial: Effectiveness of Brief Smoking Cessation Counselling in Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment Clinic (PAAC)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of a stepped primary care smoking cessation intervention (ISTAPS study): design of a cluster randomised trial.BMC public health · 2009Trial
- Effectiveness of a smoking cessation educational program for Japanese nurses on subsequent changes of behavior in delivering smoking cessation counseling.Tobacco induced diseases · 2022Article
- [The second semFYC's smokeless week: how many smokers are prepared to stop smoking in primary care and what can we do to help them?].Atencion primaria · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth care professionals frequently advise patients to improve their health by stopping smoking. Such advice may be brief, or part of more intensive interventions.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of nursing delivered smoking cessation interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register was searched for studies of interventions using nurses or health visitors and an additional search made on CINAHL. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials with follow-up of at least 6 months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently. MAIN
resultsFifteen studies comparing nursing intervention to a control or usual care found intervention to significantly increase the odds of quitting (Peto Odds Ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.24-1.66). There was heterogeneity between the study results, but pooling using a random effects model did not alter the estimate of effect. There was no evidence from indirect comparison that interventions classified as intensive had a larger effect than less intensive ones. There was limited evidence that interventions were more effective for hospital inpatients with cardiovascular disease than for inpatients with other conditions. Interventions in non hospitalised patients also showed evidence of efficacy. Three studies of nurse counseling on smoking cessation during a screening health check, not included in the main meta-analysis, suggested that under these conditions nursing intervention was likely to have less effect. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe results indicate the potential benefits of smoking cessation advice and counseling given by nurses to their patients, with reasonable evidence that interventions can be effective. The challenge will be to incorporate smoking cessation intervention as part of standard practice so that all patients are given an opportunity to be queried about their tobacco use and to be given advice to quit along with reinforcement and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.