SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimising wound-related pain at dressing change: evidence-informed practice.International wound journal · 2008Review
- Assessment and management of persistent (chronic) and total wound pain.International wound journal · 2008Review
- A review of the use of topical analgesics for myofascial pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous leg ulcers affect up to 1 per cent of people at some time in their life. These ulcers are often painful and some clinicians choose dressings to reduce the pain both during and between dressing changes.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of dressings, local anaesthetics/analgesics for pain relief in venous leg ulceration. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Wounds Group Register and the Cochrane Collaboration Field in Complementary Medicine were searched. Cochrane Pain Palliative and Supportive Care Group and Cochrane Wounds Group strategy were combined and used. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials which evaluated local interventions used to relieve venous leg ulcer pain were considered. Pain was defined as either persistent pain or pain at dressing changes or debridement. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility for inclusion was confirmed by two reviewers who independently assessed the all potential trials. Details of eligible studies were summarised using a data extraction sheet which was checked by the second reviewer. MAIN
resultsNo trial evaluated interventions for persistent pain. Three trials compared a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic (EMLA) versus placebo for pain at debridement. All 3 trials reported a significant difference in pain in favour of EMLA, however, one of the trials favoured placebo in terms of number of ulcers healed at the end of the trial and another trial noted an increased incidence of burning and itching with the use of EMLA. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsEMLA may provide pain relief for venous leg ulcer debridement however, the effect of the product on ulcer healing and the incidence of itching and burning is unclear. Research is required to address questions such as the benefits of leg ulcer debridement and the impact of EMLA on healing and the incidence of burning and itching. There were no trials addressing the treatment of persistent pain and further research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.