Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796600›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma.

P G Gibson, J Coughlan, A J Wilson, M Abramson, A Bauman, M J Hensley, E H Walters

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00129987 (A Multi-centre Randomised Trial of Lay-led Individualised Self-management Education for Adults With Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
35.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00129987 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2003, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-centre Randomised Trial of Lay-led Individualised Self-management Education for Adults With Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2003 to 2006Enrolled567ConditionsAsthmaArmsSelf management education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,383 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Shared decision-making for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Interventions for managing asthma in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Self-management education for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  9. Psychosocial factors and behavioral medicine interventions in asthma.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2013
    Pooled it
  10. Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. Primary care based clinics for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  12. Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Options for self-management education for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it
  16. Educational interventions for asthma in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. A randomized clinical trial of peak flow versus symptom monitoring in older adults with asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2006
    Trial
  20. Trial

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

P G GibsonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, John Hunter Hosptial, Respiratory Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Mail Centre, NSW, Australia, 2310. mdpgg@mail.newcastle.edu.au
J Coughlan
A J Wilson
M Abramson
A Bauman
M J Hensley
E H Walters
John Hunter Hospital · AUMonash University · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key component of many asthma management guidelines is the recommendation for patient education and regular medical review. A number of controlled trials have been conducted to measure the effectiveness of asthma education programmes. These programmes improve patient knowledge, but their impact on health outcomes is less well established. This review was conducted to examine the strength of evidence supporting Step 6 of the Australian Asthma Management Plan: "Educate and Review Regularly"; to test whether health outcomes are influenced by education and self-management programmes.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of asthma self-management programmes, when coupled with regular health practitioner review, on health outcomes in adults with asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of self-management education in adults over 16 years of age with asthma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for confirmation. MAIN

resultsTwenty-five trials were included. Self-management education was compared with usual care in 22 studies. Self-management education reduced hospitalisations (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.88); emergency room visits (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval (0.57 to 0.90); unscheduled visits to the doctor (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.82); days off work or school (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0. 79); and nocturnal asthma (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.72). Measures of lung function were little changed. Self-management programmes that involved a written action plan showed a greater reduction in hospitalisation than those that did not (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.68). People who managed their asthma by self-adjustment of their medications using an individualised written plan had better lung function than those whose medications were adjusted by a doctor. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsTraining in asthma self-management which involves self-monitoring by either peak expiratory flow or symptoms, coupled with regular medical review and a written action plan appears to improve health outcomes for adults with asthma. Training programmes which enable people to adjust their medication using a written action plan appear to be more effective than other forms of asthma self-management.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicSelf CareAdultAsthmaHumans

Identifiers

PMID10796600
PMCPMC7032643
OpenAlexW2124647361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.