Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796592›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Surgery for deep venous incompetence.

A Abidia, S C Hardy

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgery for deep venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Surgery for deep venous incompetence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A AbidiaVascular Surgery, Academic Surgical Unit, The University of Hull, Vascular Laboratory, Alderson House, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull, East Yorkshire, UK, HU3 2JZ. ahmed.abidia@usa.net
S C Hardy
Blackburn College · USUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic deep venous incompetence (DVI) is a troublesome condition with a range of symptoms in the legs including recurrent ulcers, pain and swelling. It is caused by incompetent vein valves and/or the blockage of large-calibre leg veins.

objectivesTo establish the effectiveness of various surgical procedures for treating DVI. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified from the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group's Specialised Trials Register, reference lists of relevant studies, and through contact with principal investigators of identified trials and world experts in deep venous surgery. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of surgical treatment for patients with DVI. Trials were selected by AA and checked by SCH. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers extracted the data independently. A variety of outcome measures were reported including ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) and venous refill time (VRT). MAIN

resultsOnly one trial met the inclusion criteria, none was excluded. The trial compared external valvuloplasty using limited anterior plication (LAP) in combination with ligature of incompetent superficial veins (ligation and LAP) against ligation only. The trial participants had primary valvular incompetence with mild to moderate symptoms but no venous ulcers. Ligation and LAP produced significant improvement in AVP: the mean difference between the Ligation and LAP group and the Ligation only group was -15 torr (weighted mean difference [WMD] -20.9, -9.0, confidence interval [CI] 95% fixed) at one year and -15 torr (WMD -21, -8.9, 95% CI fixed) at two years. However, there was no statistically significant improvement in VRT, the mean difference between the groups at one year was 2 seconds (WMD -2.7, 6.7; 95% CI fixed) and at two years was 4 seconds (WMD -0.7, 8.7; 95% CI fixed). AVP values after surgery remained relatively high. Nine out of eleven valves repaired remained competent after two years of follow up. No complications occurred. The overall mean score for clinical outcome was +2 (moderate improvement) in the Ligation and LAP group. This compared with +1 (mild improvement) in the Ligation only group. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe results of one small trial showed that ligation and LAP produced a moderate improvement for two years after surgery, in patients with mild to moderate DVI caused by primary valvular incompetence. However, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend the treatment to this subgroup of patients with DVI.

Indexed as

HumansLegPeripheral Vascular DiseasesVenous Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID10796592
OpenAlexW4236259226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.