SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- A New Thermo-Responsive Hyaluronic Acid Sol-Gel to Prevent Intrauterine Adhesions after Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial.Yonsei medical journal · 2020Trial
- Prevention of adhesive small bowel obstruction by anti-adhesion barriers: do they really work?Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Review
- Sprayable Polymer Blends With Short-Chain Surface Segregation for Preventing Postoperative Abdominal Adhesions.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Gynecologic postoperative anti-adhesion barriers: From biomaterials to barrier development.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
- Postoperative Adhesions: Current Research on Mechanisms, Therapeutics and Preventative Measures.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- The Determination of the Biocompatibility of New Compositional Materials, including Carbamide-Containing Heterocycles of Anti-Adhesion Agents for Abdominal Surgery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Postsurgical Adhesions: Is There Any Prophylactic Strategy Really Working?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Fertility after expanded polytetrafluoroethylene use after endometrioma cystectomy: a pilot study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Article
- Chemical Scalpel: An Experimental Collagenase-Based Treatment for Peritoneal Adhesions.Biology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of barrier agents for preventing postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Surgery today · 2021Article
- Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Anti-adhesive effects of a newly developed two-layered gelatin sheet in dogs.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2017Article
- Current status of the use of antiadhesive agents for gastric cancer surgery: a questionnaire survey in South Korea.Journal of the Korean Surgical Society · 2013Article
- Adhesion-preventing properties of 4% icodextrin and canola oil: a comparative experimental study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2012Article
- The use of novel hemostatic sealant (Tisseel) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a case-control study.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- Lap pak for abdominal retraction.Reviews in urology · 2012Article
- Barrier methods used to prevent pelvic adhesions in videolaparoscopy: experimental study in female rabbits.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic adhesions can be the result of inflamation, endometriosis or surgical trauma. Prevention of postoperative adhesions (either new or reoccurance) has been postulated by using barriers to prevent two surfaces being in contact. When pelvic surgery is being undertaken strategies to reduce pelvic adhesions occurring may be undertaken and these include barrier agents which are placed between the pelvic structures. Two synthetic barriers with differential characteristics are commercially available: oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFC) (GoreTex).
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of mechanical barriers (materials interposed between pelvic structures to prevent adherence of serosal surfaces) used during pelvic surgery in women of reproductive age on pregnancy rates, pelvic pain, or postoperative adhesion reformation. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group specialised register of controlled clinical trials was undertaken. In addition, companies were contacted for unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials of barriers versus no treatment or other barriers in women undergoing fertility preserving pelvic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reviewers assessed eligibility and trial quality. MAIN
results15 randomised controlled trials were included. Five trials randomised patients while the remainder randomised pelvic organs. Laparoscopy was the primary surgical technique in six trials while the remaining trials were laparotomy. Indications for surgery included myomectomy (five trials), ovarian surgery (four trials), pelvic adhesions (six trials), endometriosis (two trials) and mixed (one trial). Thirteen trials assessed Interceed versus no treatment, two assessed Interceed versus Gore-Tex, one trial assessed Gore-Tex versus no treatment, and one trial assessed Seprafilm versus no treatment. No study reported pregnancy or reduction in pain as an outcome. The use of Interceed in women was associated with reduced incidence of pelvic adhesion formation, both new formation and re-formation following laparoscopic surgery and after laparotomy. Gore-Tex was more effective than no barrier or Interceed in preventing adhesion formation. There was limited evidence that Seprafilm was effective in preventing adhesion formation in women following myomectomy. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe absorbable adhesion barrier Interceed reduces the incidence of adhesion formation, both new formation and re-formation, at laparoscopy and laparotomy, but there are insufficient data to support its use to improve pregnancy rates. Gore-Tex may be superior to Interceed in preventing adhesion formation but its usefulness is limited by the need for suturing and later removal. There was no evidence of effectiveness of Seprafilm in preventing adhesion formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.