Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796548›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility.

C Farquhar, P Vandekerckhove, A Watson, A Vail, D Wiseman

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anti-adhesive effects of a newly developed two-layered gelatin sheet in dogs.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Lap pak for abdominal retraction.Reviews in urology · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C FarquharDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Women's Hospital, Claude Road, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003. c.farquhar@auckland.ac.nz
P Vandekerckhove
A Watson
A Vail
D Wiseman
Salford Royal Hospital · GBSt. Mary’s Hospital · ZATameside Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic adhesions can be the result of inflamation, endometriosis or surgical trauma. Prevention of postoperative adhesions (either new or reoccurance) has been postulated by using barriers to prevent two surfaces being in contact. When pelvic surgery is being undertaken strategies to reduce pelvic adhesions occurring may be undertaken and these include barrier agents which are placed between the pelvic structures. Two synthetic barriers with differential characteristics are commercially available: oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFC) (GoreTex).

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of mechanical barriers (materials interposed between pelvic structures to prevent adherence of serosal surfaces) used during pelvic surgery in women of reproductive age on pregnancy rates, pelvic pain, or postoperative adhesion reformation. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group specialised register of controlled clinical trials was undertaken. In addition, companies were contacted for unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials of barriers versus no treatment or other barriers in women undergoing fertility preserving pelvic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reviewers assessed eligibility and trial quality. MAIN

results15 randomised controlled trials were included. Five trials randomised patients while the remainder randomised pelvic organs. Laparoscopy was the primary surgical technique in six trials while the remaining trials were laparotomy. Indications for surgery included myomectomy (five trials), ovarian surgery (four trials), pelvic adhesions (six trials), endometriosis (two trials) and mixed (one trial). Thirteen trials assessed Interceed versus no treatment, two assessed Interceed versus Gore-Tex, one trial assessed Gore-Tex versus no treatment, and one trial assessed Seprafilm versus no treatment. No study reported pregnancy or reduction in pain as an outcome. The use of Interceed in women was associated with reduced incidence of pelvic adhesion formation, both new formation and re-formation following laparoscopic surgery and after laparotomy. Gore-Tex was more effective than no barrier or Interceed in preventing adhesion formation. There was limited evidence that Seprafilm was effective in preventing adhesion formation in women following myomectomy. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe absorbable adhesion barrier Interceed reduces the incidence of adhesion formation, both new formation and re-formation, at laparoscopy and laparotomy, but there are insufficient data to support its use to improve pregnancy rates. Gore-Tex may be superior to Interceed in preventing adhesion formation but its usefulness is limited by the need for suturing and later removal. There was no evidence of effectiveness of Seprafilm in preventing adhesion formation.

Indexed as

Cellulose, OxidizedCervix UteriFemaleHumansInfertility, FemalePelvisPolytetrafluoroethylenePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainTissue AdhesionsCellulose, OxidizedPolytetrafluoroethylene

Identifiers

PMID10796548
OpenAlexW1560867520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.